| Technology or Measure | Energy Savings Potential | CO2 Emission Reduction Potential Based on Literature | Costs | Development Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Using Improved Materials for Reformer Tubes |
Replacement of the reformer tubes in the Indian plant required an investment of Rs. 50 million. The payback time was 40 months (PCRA,, 2009 p.335).
| Commercial | ||
| Heat Recovery from Reformer Flue Gas |
Reducing the stack temperature by 100˚C will result in energy savings of approximately 0.4 GJ/ t NH3 (Christensen, 2001).
At an ammonia plant in Pakistan, a demineralized water preheating coil was installed to recover heat from the flue gas (240˚C). The temperature of the flue gas was lowered to 137˚C, recovering approximately 44 GJ/hour of waste heat from the flue gases (Yousaf, 2011)
|
Heat recovery in the Pakistani plant saved $ 2 Million/year (Yousaf, 2011)
| Commercial | |
| Using Improved Catalyst Designs for Primary Reforming | Commercial | |||
| Improving the Design for Induced Draft Fan Ducts | Commercial | |||
| Heat Exchange Autothermal Reforming |
The investment cost are stated to be 303 Yen/tonne ammonia, resulting in a payback time of one year (1999 figures) (ECCJ, 1999, 148).
| Commercial | ||
| Increasing Reformer Operating Pressure | Commercial | |||
| Modification of Burners in Primary Reforming | Commercial | |||
| Using an Adiabatic Pre-reformer |
Energy consumption can be reduced by 4-10% (IPTS/EC, 2007; Nieuwlaar, 2001; Patel et al., unknown date)
|
For a 2 000 t/day plant, the investment cost associated with the installation of a pre-reformer is reported to ¥280 million, resulting in a payback time of 1.7 years (ECCJ, 1999 p. 156).
According to Nieuwlaar (2001) the investment cost is estimated at €7.5/GJ.
| Commercial | |
| Insulation of Reformer Furnace |
An assessment for an Australian ammonia plant estimated that the payback time for improving insulation on reformer furnace will have a payback time of less than one year (Australian Government, 2009).
| Commercial | ||
| Improved Design of Secondary Reformer Burner | Commercial | |||
| Using Improved Catalyst Designs for Secondary Reforming | Commercial | |||
| Shifting Reformer Duty |
This measure increases the capital costs (FAI, 2013).
| Commercial | ||
| High Emissivity Coating of Radiant Section Refractory | Commercial | |||
| Heat Exchanger Reformer | ||||
| Lower Steam to Carbon Ratio on Reformer | Commercial | |||
| Installing a Feed Gas Saturator | Commercial | |||
| Increasing Mixed Feed Preheat Temperature | Commercial |
EHSQLaw Greenko -AMGreen Group (Env-Energy,Health,Safety,Security ,Social Ac.Quality-Lab) Tech.Serv.
EHSQL team building , AMGreen and GreenkoGroupFounder Dr. Anil Chalamalasetty and Shri Mahesh Koli Sir,Shri Gautam Reddy,Dr.K.Pradeep,Dr. Rambabu P.,Shri H.Menon,Shri Ch.Srinivas Rao,Shri N. SeshaGiri, Shri GSV Raja,Shri GVS Anand,Shri K.GangadharRao,Shri Madhav KG Dr.V.S.John,Shri Badusha V. Shaik,Shri S. Simhachalam, Shri PVSN Raju,Shri B.B.K U.Maheswar Rao,Shri S.Tatayya,Shri P.Nagaraju,Shri S.K. Dash,Shri CH ApplaRaju,Shri LVV Rao, Shri P. Srinivaslu, EHSQL by Dr.A.N.GIRI-36.3Lakhs Viewed
Tuesday, 26 September 2017
The chemical and petrochemical sector is the largest industrial energy consumer. Ammonia production is responsible for about 17% of the energy consumed in this sector. In 2004, the ammonia manufacturing industry consumed 5.6 EJ of fossil fuels, of which 2.7 EJ was for energy and 2.9 EJ for feedstock use.1 Although the energy use per tonne of ammonia has decreased by 30% over the last thirty years, adopting best available technologies (BAT) worldwide can further reduce energy use by 20-25%1, 2 and decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 30%.2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment