EHSQLaw Greenko -AMGreen Group (Env-Energy,Health,Safety,Security ,Social Ac.Quality-Lab) Tech.Serv.

EHSQL team building , AMGreen and GreenkoGroupFounder Dr. Anil Chalamalasetty and Shri Mahesh Koli Sir,Shri Gautam Reddy,Dr.K.Pradeep,Dr. Rambabu P.,Shri H.Menon,Shri Ch.Srinivas Rao,Shri N. SeshaGiri, Shri GSV Raja,Shri GVS Anand,Shri K.GangadharRao,Shri Madhav KG Shri Satish Babu, Shri Badusha V. Shaik, Shri Srinivas Reddy,Dr.V.S.John,Shri S. Simhachalam, Shri PVSN Raju,Shri B.B.K U.Maheswar Rao,Shri S.Tatayya,Shri S.K. Dash,Shri CH ApplaRaju,Shri LVV Rao EHSQL by Dr.A.N.GIRI-37.5Lakhs Viewed

Friday, 24 April 2020

CORN NUTRITION

CORN NUTRITION 

It is imperative to understand the principles of soil fertility to efficiently manage corn nutrients, and corn production, and environmental stewardship.  There are 17 chemical elements that are known to be essential for plant growth, 14 of these elements come from the soil. Each essential plant nutrients needed in different amounts by the plant, each varies in mobility within the plant and varies in concentration in the harvested mature corn plant components. Knowing the relative amount of each nutrient by crop and the amounts removed with harvest is useful for calculating the amount of fertility that will need to be added to the soil to maintain optimum harvest levels).

ESSENTIAL PLANT ELEMENTS, SOURCE, ROLES AND RELATIVE QUANTITIES IN THE PLANT
Table 1. from Overview of Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition, and nutrient Management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, Antonia P. Mallarina Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.  Table 1. from Overview of Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition, and nutrient Management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, Antonia P. Mallarina Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.
To be classified as “essential”, the element needs to meet the following criteria:
  • The plant cannot complete its life cycle (seed to new seed) without it.
  • The elements’ function cannot be replaced by another element.
  • The element is directly involved in the plant’s growth and reproduction.  

Non-mineral nutrients:

 

Three elements, carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O), are non-mineral nutrients because they are derived from the air and water. Although they represent approximately 95% of plant biomass, they are generally given little attention in plant nutrition because they are almost always in sufficient supply. However, other factors such as soil management and the environmental conditions can influence the availability and crop growth response.
Figure 1. Mineral Nutrients Required for Plant Growth  Figure 1. Mineral Nutrients Required for Plant Growth
The 14 mineral nutrients are classified as either macronutrients or micronutrients based upon plant requirements and relative fertilization need. There are 6 macronutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S). The macronutrients, N, P, K, are often classified as primary macronutrients, because deficiencies of N, P, K are more common than the secondary macronutrients, Ca, Mg, and S. The micronutrients include boron (B), chlorine (Cl), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn). Most of the macronutrients represent 0.1 -5% or 100-5000 parts per million (ppm), of dry plant tissue, whereas the micronutrients generally comprise less than .025% or 250ppm, of dry plant tissue (Table1).

How plants uptake nutrients:

 

Each of the nutrients cannot be taken up by plants in its elemental form, they must instead be taken up in an ‘ionic’ or charged form, with the exception of boron (B) as boric acid which is uncharged (Table 2). Most fertilizers are made up of combinations of these available nutrient forms, so when fertilizer dissolves, the nutrient(s) can be immediately available for uptake. Knowing what form of a nutrient the plant absorbs helps inform what controls the cycling and movement of the nutrient in the soil. Additionally, understanding how nutrients function within the plant is useful in diagnosing nutrient deficiencies.

NUTRIENT FORMS TAKEN UP BY PLANTS
Table 2. from Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, and Antonia P. Mallarina, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.  Table 2. from Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, and Antonia P. Mallarina, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.
Nutrient uptake by roots is dependent on the activity of the root (corn root number, root dry matter, and root length), ability to absorb nutrients, and the nutrient concentration at the surface of the root. Roots come directly in contact with some nutrients (interception) as they grow; however, this only accounts for a very low percentage of the total amount of nutrients taken up by plants. Therefore, other mechanisms must cause the movement of nutrients to the plant.
Water moves toward and into the root as the plant use water or transpires. This process is referred to as ‘mass flow’, accounts for a substantial amount of nutrient movement toward the plant root, especially for the mobile nutrients such as NO3-.  Specifically, mass flow has been found to account for about 80% of N movement into the root system of a plant, yet only 5% of the more immobile P. It has been found that ‘diffusion’ accounts for the remainder of the nutrient movement.
Diffusion is the process where chemicals move from an area of high concentration to any area of low concentration. Fertilizing near the plant root, the plant is less dependent on exchange processes and diffusion to uptake nutrients, especially P. The nutrients that are most dependent diffusion to move them toward a plant root are relatively immobile, have relatively low solution concentrations, and yet are needed in large amounts by the plant, such as P and K. The secondary macronutrients (Ca, Mg, S) often do not depend of diffusion because their solution concentrations are fairly high in soil, relative to plant requirements.

How nutrients move within the plant

 

All nutrients move relatively easily from the root to the growing portions of the plant. Some nutrients can also move from older tissue to newer tissue if there is a deficiency of that nutrient. Knowing which nutrients are ‘mobile’ is very useful in diagnosing plant nutrient deficiencies because if only the lower leaves are affected, then a mobile nutrient is most likely the cause. Conversely, if only the upper leaves show the deficiency, then the plant is likely deficient with an immobile nutrient because that nutrient cannot move from older to newer leaves. Table 3 list the six mobile and eight immobile mineral nutrients. Sulfur is one element that lies between mobile and immobile elements depending on the degree of deficiency.

MOBILE AND IMMOBILE NUTRIENTS
Table 3. from Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, and Antonia P. Mallarina, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.  Table 3. from Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management, NRCS, Agustin Pagoni, John E. Sawyer, and Antonia P. Mallarina, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University.

Nutrient Deficiencies of Corn Symptoms

 

The following pictures represent some of the more common nutrient deficiency symptoms in corn. When visual symptoms of nutrient deficiency particularly N and K, yield loss has occurred. 
Figure 2. Nitrogen (N) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, C.Witt, J.M. Pasuquin  Figure 2. Nitrogen (N) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, C.Witt, J.M. Pasuquin
Figure 3. Phosphorous (P) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Jason Kelly, Mozaffari  Figure 3. Phosphorous (P) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Jason Kelly, Mozaffari
Figure 4. Potassium (K) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M. Hasegawa  Figure 4. Potassium (K) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M. Hasegawa
Figure 5. Magnesium (Mg) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, P. Kumar  Figure 5. Magnesium (Mg) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, P. Kumar
Figure 6. Calcium (Ca) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M.K. Sharma and P. Kumar Figure 6. Calcium (Ca) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection., M.K. Sharma and P. Kumar
Figure 7. Iron (Fe) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M, K. Sharma and P. Kumar  Figure 7. Iron (Fe) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M, K. Sharma and P. Kumar
Figure 8. Zinc (Zn) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Dr. Gurupada Balol.  Figure 8. Zinc (Zn) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Dr. Gurupada Balol.
Figure 9. Manganese (Mn) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M, K. Sharma and P. Kumar  Figure 9. Manganese (Mn) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, M, K. Sharma and P. Kumar
Figure 10. Boron (B) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, J.E. Espinoza  Figure 10. Boron (B) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, J.E. Espinoza
Figure 11. Copper (Cu) Deficiency in Corn.  Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, T. Yamada  Figure 11. Copper (Cu) Deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, T. Yamada
Figure 12. Sulfur (S) deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Jashandeep Kaur  Figure 12. Sulfur (S) deficiency in Corn. Photo is provided courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) and its IPNI Crop Nutrient Deficiency Image Collection, Jashandeep Kaur

Developing Fertilizer Recommendations, understanding Nutrient Uptake and Partitioning

 

Biotechnology, breeding, and agronomic advancements have increased corn yields to new highs. Current fertilization practices developed decades ago, may not match the requirements of newer hybrids which are now grown at population densities higher than ever before. A re-evaluation of nutrient uptake and partitioning can provide the foundation for fine-tuning our practices as we strive to achieve corn’s maximum yield potential. 
When developing fertilizer recommendations, two major aspects of plant nutrition are important to understand and manage high yield corn production:
  • Total Nutrient Uptake: The amount of a given mineral nutrient acquired during the growing season.
  • Partitioning: The amount of that nutrient contained in the grain or removed withthegrain.
Further improving fertility practices require matching in-season nutrient uptake with the availability of nutrients. For some nutrients (e.g., N, P, K, Mg, Mn, and Fe), as much as two-thirds of total uptake occurs during vegetative growth. Of critical importance is supplying N to meet corn’s peak needs of 7.8 lb N/day from V10-V14. Uptake of N does not cease at VT/R1 since as much of 50 lb N/acre is accumulated and petitioned directly into the developing seeds during grain fill.
Contrary to nutrients like N and K, nutrient accumulation of P, S, Zn, and Cu is equally distributed between vegetative growth and during reproductive growth (ear development and grain-fill). Season-long supply of P, S, Zn, and Cu is imperative to maximize corn yields. Relative to total uptake, P is removed to a greater extent than any other nutrient. Agronomic practices which do not adequately replace removed P may eventually lead to a depletion in soil fertility levels.
Even though nutrient management is a complex process, improving understanding of uptake timing and rates, partitioning, and remobilization of nutrient by corn provides opportunities to optimize fertilizer rates and application timing.

CORN NUTRIENT REMOVAL - GRAIN ONLY (LB)
CORN NUTRIENT REMOVAL - STOVER ONLY (LB)
Tables 4 and 5:  N, P, K, and S numbers courtesy of International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI). These numbers are estimations. Actual nutrient removal may vary based on many factors.

Fertilization of Macro Nutrients in Corn Production:

 

Nitrogen (N) is the fertilizer element required in the largest amounts and the greatest cost. Each bushel of grain harvested will contain almost a pound of N. For silage nitrogen use is over 10 pounds for every 1,000 pounds of dry matter. Nitrogen must be provided by the soil or by fertilizer N since only one-third to two -thirds of the N added is recovered in the harvested corn. Most of the unrecovered N is irreversibly lost from the soil (leaching). 
Nitrogen recovery is not only variable but also unpredictable. The unpredictability is primarily due to the effect of weather on the release of soil N on the fate of fertilizer N. This makes it impossible to predict precisely the quantity of N required for maximum yield and maximum economic return. It also makes it impossible to perform a meaningful soil test for N. Biological and chemical reactions are continuously changing soil N from one form to another, and each form behaves very differently. 
Organic soil N is mostly insoluble and not directly available to plants. Virtually all soils contain a large quantity of organic N. A soil that has 3 percent organic matter contains over 3000 pounds of organic nitrogen per acre. However, only a small part of this, 1 to 5 percent each growing season, is broken down to in inorganic N forms and available to plants. 
Inorganic ammonium (NH4+) is either released by organic matter decomposition or added as fertilizer N. Ammonium is a relatively immobile ion that behaves much like K+. Under some conditions, it can be lost from the soil as ammonia (NH3) gas but is not susceptible to leaching or denitrification as is nitrate (NO3-). Corn takes up NH4+  less readily than NO3-. In most soils that are suitable for corn production, NH4  is rapidly converted to NO3-  in a process called ‘nitrification’. This reaction is completed within a few days to a month after fertilization, depending on soil temperatures.
Nitrate is a highly mobile ion because its solubility in water is essentially unlimited and because it does not interact significantly with the clays or organic matter of most soils. Since NO3 moves with soil water, it is readily available to plants but also is susceptible to leaching below the root zone. Leaching losses of fertilizer N are most significant on well-drained soils during long-lasting or very intense rainfall. Denitrification is a microbiological reaction that can proceed very rapidly when soils become water-saturated. It is important in soils with slow drainage characteristics are prevalent in the rooting zone. Some nitrate is lost almost every year in all soils, but such losses become serious when heavy rains fall within a month after fertilization. Soil drainage is the most reliable predictor of total loss so more N fertilizer is required in poorly drained soils. The tillage system also influences this process. Denitrification, leaching, and immobilization can all be greater in  no-till soils, so N rates should general be increased slightly when using no-till.
With few exceptions, plants respond equally to all inorganic forms of N fertilizer. Ammonia forms are generally equivalent to NO3- forms because they are converted to NO3-. Urea (NH2-CO-NH2) can be an important exception. Urea is rapidly converted to NH4+ in the soil which makes the soil near the granule more alkaline. This favors the formation of NH3 gas from NH4. The large fraction of N sometimes can be volatilized as NH3 if urea is broadcast on moist, warm soil. Losses can be minimized by avoiding these conditions or by incorporating the urea into the soil. In some locations, urea is available at a lower price than alternative N forms and so it may be more economical to use, despite the greater risk of loss. Urea should not be considered a slow-release fertilizer. 
Organic sources of N should not be ignored when estimating N fertilizer needs. Sods, legumes cover crops and animal manure can replace a large portion or, in some cases almost all the inorganic N application.
Nitrogen applied as a liquid, either solution or suspension, is not necessarily more effective than solid N. The choice between liquids and solids should be the case on cost, handling, and convenience.
Nitrogen application timing and effective method of increasing N recovery by corn are to delay or split the N application. This practice works because young corn plants (up to 4 to 6 weeks) require very little N and most can be supplied by the soil. Soil are the wettest and so most prone to N loses early in the season. Delayed applications are most beneficial where denitrification and leaching losses are greatest, particularly on poorly or moderately well-drained soils. A general guideline for these types of soils, if two-thirds or more of the N is applied 4 to 6 weeks after planting, the total N application can be reduced by 25 to 50 pounds per acre. Fall application of N in most corn production areas is generally not recommended. In those areas where fall anhydrous ammonia is applied, attention to soil temperature that needs to be below 50°F. 
Nitrogen placement has no consistent, significant effect on the efficiency of N fertilizers containing NH4 and NO3- salts. Researchers have sometimes observed benefits of banding or sub-surface application under certain conditions, but the evidence is not yet complete enough to justify the machinery alterations and extra time which will usually be required. Incorporating area immediately after application will reduce the risk of volatilization.
Nitrogen inhibitors are chemicals that act specifically to inhibit the conversion NH4 to NO3- and indirectly reduce the change of early-season leaching and denitrification. These chemicals are beneficial only when such losses are potentially significant. In many areas where corn is produced, plants have responded consistently to inhibitors on less than well-drained no-till soils. 

Phosphorous (P) and Potassium (K):

 

Both phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) are required in large quantities for good corn growth and yields. A good corn crop will take up 30 to 40 pounds of phosphate (P2O5) and 100 to 150 pounds of potash (K2O) per acre. About three-fourth of the phosphate and about a third of the potash is in the grain, the remainder is being utilized in the leaves, stalk, roots, husks, and cob. In grain production systems where all crop residues are left on the field, 20 to 30 pounds of P2O5 and 35 to 40 pounds of K2O are removed from the soils in the grain. In silage production, all P2O5 and K2O taken up by the plant, except that in the roots and stubble, is removed from the soil.
It is important that adequate P2O5 and K2O be available for plant uptake during the first half of the growing season. By the time kernels start filling rapidly (70 to 75 days after seedling emergence and 10 to 15 days after silking) the plant will have taken up about 70 percent of its P2O5 requirement and nearly 90 percent of it K2O requirement.
Both P and K are considered immobile elements since they react with the soil in many ways that minimize their movement with soil water. This is particularly true of P since it forms compounds with soil calcium, iron, aluminum, manganese and zinc which are less soluble than the P compounds in fertilizer. If soil pH is in the range of 6.0 to 6.5, much of the fertilizer P will react to form monocalcium or dicalcium phosphates which are more soluble than the iron, aluminum and manganese phosphate that form at lower pH levels. Therefore, increased P availability is one benefit of good liming practices. Potassium, like NH4, is retained on clays and organic matter by cation exchange (CEC). Except on low cation exchange capacity soil such as very sandy soils, the soil cation exchange capacity is great enough to hold an adequate reservoir of readily available K+. Leaching of P and K is generally limited to these low CEC soils. Loss of P and K by the erosion of topsoil is a great concern in many areas of the corn belt. 
P and K requirement for good corn growth are directly related to the amount of plant-available P and K already in the soil. Using a reliable soil testing lab which employs field-tested procedures is the best way to determine soil content of plant-available P and K. Recommendations made by university soil labs and many of the independent labs, based on the Mehelich III extraction (see example Table 6). The annual amount of P and K taken up by the plant form fertilizer is not likely to exceed 15 to 20 percent of P or 25 to 40 percent of K applied.  Check with your local extension service or fertilizer dealer for a specific recommendation for your area.

RECOMMENDED RATES OF PHOSPHATE AND POTASH APPLICATION (IN LB/A) FOR CORN, AS RELATED TO SOIL TEST VALUE.
1Where soil test values indicate extremely low levels of P in the soil (less than 5) and where fertilizer P must be broadcast and disked into the soil, up to 200 lb/acre may be beneficial. Developed as an example from University of Kentucky AGR-15 Fertilization and Liming for Corn.
Commercial fertilizers are the most widely used source of P and K for corn production. Sources of P most commonly used are triple superphosphate (0-46-0), diammonium phosphate (18-46-0), monoammonium phosphate (11-48-0), and a wide array of other ammoniated phosphates, both liquid and dry. The most commonly used sources of fertilizer P are considered equally effective for agronomic purposes when used at recommended rates and properly applied. Solid and fluid forms of P are also considered equally effective.
 Almost all K fertilizer used for corn is murate of potash (0-0-60). Other sources are sulfate of potash (0-0-50) and sulfate of potash magnesia (0-0-18, 11S, 18Mg). All are considered equally effective.
 Organic sources of P and K, such as animal manures and sewage sludge, may also be used for supplying P and K. The nutrient content of manures and sewage sludge varies, so a nutrient analysis of the manure is necessary to determine how valuable it will be as a soil amendment. Also, it is important to know the content of heavy metals (nickel, cadmium, and chromium) to prevent toxic build-up in the soil.
Placement of P and K by broadcast is the most convenient method of application, although large amounts are required at very low soil test levels. Banded applications (2 inches to the side and 2 inches below the seed) can increase agronomic efficiency of P and K, making it possible to decrease the usual rate by 1/3 to 1/2. A “starter” effect, or improved initial growth, is likely to result from a banded placement. This may appear very significant during the early growing season, but rarely does it increase yields, provided that the P and K is used at recommended rates.


SOURCES:
Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management. Agustin Pagani, John E. Sawyer, Antonio P. Mallarino/Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University. Developed in cooperation with Lara Moody, TFI; John David, NRCS; and Steve Phillips, IPNI.
http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/4r/ppt/Chapter-1%20Overview_Ver4.pdf
 AGR-105 Fertilization and Liming for Corn, University of Kentucky, www2.ca.uky.edu/agcomm/pubs/agr/agr105/agr105.htm
 Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Alfalfa, Extension Bulletin E-2567
Sources Verified 9/14/2019
Posted by Dr. Amar Nath Giri--Greenko group on April 24, 2020
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

1 comment:

  1. Anna Leeon12 August 2022 at 02:05

    Nice post. Well, what can I say is that these is an interesting and very informative topic on plant growth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Dr. Amar Nath Giri--Greenko group
KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, India
M.Sc., PGDEPL,CES,DCA, Ph.D Environmental SCIENCE &ENV; LAW, EX IIM LUCKNOW FELLOW, EX IGIDR MUMBAI FELLOW, EX PRESIDENT-EPSA, ISCN, TGTF, WORKED at NAGARJUNGA GROUP-NFCL
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ►  2011 (5)
    • ►  December 2011 (5)
  • ►  2012 (1929)
    • ►  March 2012 (7)
    • ►  April 2012 (201)
    • ►  May 2012 (213)
    • ►  June 2012 (145)
    • ►  July 2012 (172)
    • ►  August 2012 (279)
    • ►  September 2012 (223)
    • ►  October 2012 (251)
    • ►  November 2012 (166)
    • ►  December 2012 (272)
  • ►  2013 (1854)
    • ►  January 2013 (325)
    • ►  February 2013 (212)
    • ►  March 2013 (215)
    • ►  April 2013 (161)
    • ►  May 2013 (198)
    • ►  June 2013 (157)
    • ►  July 2013 (130)
    • ►  August 2013 (73)
    • ►  September 2013 (131)
    • ►  October 2013 (101)
    • ►  November 2013 (81)
    • ►  December 2013 (70)
  • ►  2014 (545)
    • ►  January 2014 (40)
    • ►  February 2014 (23)
    • ►  March 2014 (51)
    • ►  April 2014 (22)
    • ►  May 2014 (46)
    • ►  June 2014 (30)
    • ►  July 2014 (86)
    • ►  August 2014 (62)
    • ►  September 2014 (51)
    • ►  October 2014 (44)
    • ►  November 2014 (41)
    • ►  December 2014 (49)
  • ►  2015 (1505)
    • ►  January 2015 (41)
    • ►  February 2015 (45)
    • ►  March 2015 (113)
    • ►  April 2015 (145)
    • ►  May 2015 (132)
    • ►  June 2015 (128)
    • ►  July 2015 (113)
    • ►  August 2015 (222)
    • ►  September 2015 (126)
    • ►  October 2015 (98)
    • ►  November 2015 (142)
    • ►  December 2015 (200)
  • ►  2016 (1339)
    • ►  January 2016 (149)
    • ►  February 2016 (47)
    • ►  March 2016 (149)
    • ►  April 2016 (160)
    • ►  May 2016 (119)
    • ►  June 2016 (133)
    • ►  July 2016 (88)
    • ►  August 2016 (86)
    • ►  September 2016 (83)
    • ►  October 2016 (109)
    • ►  November 2016 (89)
    • ►  December 2016 (127)
  • ►  2017 (877)
    • ►  January 2017 (90)
    • ►  February 2017 (97)
    • ►  March 2017 (94)
    • ►  April 2017 (90)
    • ►  May 2017 (65)
    • ►  June 2017 (44)
    • ►  July 2017 (53)
    • ►  August 2017 (49)
    • ►  September 2017 (60)
    • ►  October 2017 (74)
    • ►  November 2017 (108)
    • ►  December 2017 (53)
  • ►  2018 (997)
    • ►  January 2018 (26)
    • ►  February 2018 (67)
    • ►  March 2018 (124)
    • ►  April 2018 (111)
    • ►  May 2018 (98)
    • ►  June 2018 (95)
    • ►  July 2018 (83)
    • ►  August 2018 (116)
    • ►  September 2018 (63)
    • ►  October 2018 (84)
    • ►  November 2018 (52)
    • ►  December 2018 (78)
  • ►  2019 (638)
    • ►  January 2019 (31)
    • ►  February 2019 (69)
    • ►  March 2019 (68)
    • ►  April 2019 (59)
    • ►  May 2019 (31)
    • ►  June 2019 (95)
    • ►  July 2019 (43)
    • ►  August 2019 (55)
    • ►  September 2019 (59)
    • ►  October 2019 (34)
    • ►  November 2019 (57)
    • ►  December 2019 (37)
  • ▼  2020 (726)
    • ►  January 2020 (74)
    • ►  February 2020 (87)
    • ►  March 2020 (114)
    • ▼  April 2020 (53)
      • Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada ...
      • World Population by Year
      • NFCL EMPLOYEES ARE GOING TO CONTRIBUTE One day sal...
      • Disinfectants Sodium hypochlorite
      • Suggestions for improvement of laboratory workflows
      • Importance of using contamination free laboratory ...
      • Role of HPLC in Cleaning Validation of Laboratory ...
      • Water Solutions - Correlation between KMnO4, COD, ...
      • PM interacts with CMs to strategize ahead for tack...
      • Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada ...
      • April weather forecast and climate Kakinada, India
      • Monthly weather forecast and climate Kakinada, India
      • राजा राम आइए .सीता राम आइए .मेरे भोजन का भोग लगाइए
      • PM Janaushadhi Kendra people are working as Corona...
      • Dr. Harsh Vardhan exhorts CSIR scientists to devel...
      • CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CC...
      • Text of PM’s address to the Nation
      • NFL making available urea fertilisers to farmers u...
      • POWERGRID carrying out CSR activities to combat CO...
      • Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada ...
      • Amid COVID-19 Pandemic Department of Fertilizers i...
      • As Part of PMGKY Package EPFO Settles 3.31 Lakh CO...
      • DRDO Introduces two new products to enable COVID-1...
      • Importance of HPLC grade solvents in HPLC analysis
      • HPLC – The new age analytical technique!
      • Important role of preventive maintenance in smooth...
      • How to minimize cost on HPLC column replacements?
      • National Fertilizers ltd is taking active part in ...
      • Power Ministry floats draft Electricity Act; invit...
      • The true warriors of corona virus serving from the...
      • SOPs for Movement of stranded Migrant Labourers, w...
      • To fight COVID 19 pandemic all efforts are being c...
      • EARTH DAY 2020 FAQ
      • Minister of Environment, Forest
      • Cabinet approves fixation of Nutrient Based Subsid...
      • Subject: Earth Day 2020 :: Message of UN Environm...
      • Waste Heat Boiler Preparation (Courtesy of Rentech...
      • Natural gas production during March,2020 was 2411....
      • CORN NUTRITION
      • READING AND INTERPRETING A SOIL TEST
      • Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada ...
      • World Day for Safety and Health at Work 2020 - Sto...
      • 10 INTERESTING FACTS ABOUT KAKINADA THAT YOU PROBA...
      • Record fertilizer sales during lockdown period
      • World should unite towards making Environment tech...
      • Local Weather Report and Forecast For: Kakinada ...
      • Desiccant breathers remove contaminants such as di...
      • Water In Oil Contamination
      • How to Measure Water In Oil
      • Options for Removing Water in Oil
      • Table 1. Comparison of Water-Removing Technologies
      • Detecting and Controlling Water in Oil
      • Cavitation Explained and Illustrated
    • ►  May 2020 (31)
    • ►  June 2020 (48)
    • ►  July 2020 (88)
    • ►  August 2020 (77)
    • ►  September 2020 (62)
    • ►  October 2020 (53)
    • ►  November 2020 (16)
    • ►  December 2020 (23)
  • ►  2021 (57)
    • ►  January 2021 (20)
    • ►  February 2021 (12)
    • ►  March 2021 (3)
    • ►  May 2021 (3)
    • ►  June 2021 (11)
    • ►  July 2021 (1)
    • ►  August 2021 (7)
  • ►  2022 (205)
    • ►  March 2022 (21)
    • ►  April 2022 (26)
    • ►  May 2022 (13)
    • ►  June 2022 (6)
    • ►  July 2022 (22)
    • ►  August 2022 (20)
    • ►  September 2022 (12)
    • ►  October 2022 (19)
    • ►  December 2022 (66)
  • ►  2023 (446)
    • ►  January 2023 (29)
    • ►  February 2023 (13)
    • ►  March 2023 (43)
    • ►  April 2023 (40)
    • ►  May 2023 (51)
    • ►  June 2023 (74)
    • ►  July 2023 (53)
    • ►  August 2023 (49)
    • ►  September 2023 (82)
    • ►  October 2023 (11)
    • ►  November 2023 (1)
  • ►  2024 (942)
    • ►  March 2024 (1)
    • ►  July 2024 (28)
    • ►  August 2024 (86)
    • ►  September 2024 (74)
    • ►  October 2024 (189)
    • ►  November 2024 (275)
    • ►  December 2024 (289)
  • ►  2025 (2385)
    • ►  January 2025 (292)
    • ►  February 2025 (175)
    • ►  March 2025 (247)
    • ►  April 2025 (197)
    • ►  May 2025 (166)
    • ►  June 2025 (275)
    • ►  July 2025 (383)
    • ►  August 2025 (306)
    • ►  September 2025 (154)
    • ►  October 2025 (61)
    • ►  November 2025 (14)
    • ►  December 2025 (115)
  • ►  2026 (80)
    • ►  January 2026 (67)
    • ►  February 2026 (13)

Labels

  • Dr. Giri
  • K
  • Sharma former CHIEF ENV. OFFICER
  • UPPCB

Report Abuse

Facebook Badge

DrAmar Nathgiri

Create Your Badge

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

  • ISO 45001:2016
    ISO 45001:2016 Now at Committee Draft Stage, the replacement of OHSAS 18001 will become the ISO standard for health & safety man...
  • Is your son/daughter driving safe from ROAD accident? Head scarves a must, but no HELMET.
    Is your son/daughter driving safe from ROAD accident? Head scarves a must, but no HELMET. How much do you love your life? How mu...
  • Andhra Pradesh to get world’s largest green ammonia project at Kakinada
    Written by our beloved CM The world is actively seeking cleaner and more sustainable alternatives for the future. Green ammonia is one such ...

Why Mock Drills Are Critical for Workplace Safety 🚨

  • Home
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.