|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
I.
|
A. CRUDE OIL
PRODUCTION – PERFORMANCE
|
||||||||||
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (TMT)
|
Actual Production (TMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year
(%age)
|
||||||
January, 2013*
|
3456.239
|
3165.091
|
91.6
|
-8.4
|
-0.2
|
||||||
April-January, 2013*
|
33335.188
|
31763.895
|
95.3
|
-4.7
|
-0.4
|
||||||
April-January, 2012
|
|
31875.799
|
|
|
|
||||||
TMT: Million Metric Tonnes.
|
|
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
B. COMPANY-WISE
ACHIEVEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Company / State
|
Planned Target (TMT)
|
Actual Production (TMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
|
|||||||
ONGC
|
2095.000
|
1923.000
|
91.8
|
-8.2
|
|||||||
Gujarat
|
457.000
|
435.000
|
95.2
|
|
|||||||
Andhra Pradesh
|
25.000
|
26.000
|
104.0
|
|
|||||||
Tamil Nadu
|
17.000
|
19.000
|
111.8
|
|
|||||||
Assam
|
105.000
|
95.000
|
90.5
|
|
|||||||
Tripura
|
1.0000
|
0.0000
|
0.0
|
|
|||||||
Mumbai Region (incl Mumbai High)
|
1490.000
|
1348.000
|
90.5
|
|
|||||||
OIL
|
338.200
|
295.569
|
87.4
|
-12.6
|
|||||||
Assam
|
336.100
|
293.559
|
87.3
|
|
|||||||
Arunachal Pradesh
|
2.100
|
2.010
|
95.7
|
|
|||||||
PRIVATE/JVC
|
1023.039
|
946.522
|
92.5
|
-7.5
|
|||||||
TOTAL
|
3456.239
|
3165.091
|
91.6
|
-8.4
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
C. REASONS FOR
SHORTFALL
|
|||||||||||
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Gujarat)
|
Poor Influx, increasing water cut trend & power shutdowns.
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Mumbai High Offshore)
|
Base potential affected due to lesser availability of inputs. Less than anticipated oil gain from side
track & development wells. Delay
in project execution of G-1 field.
|
||||||||||
OIL (Assam)
|
Higher average decline rate in matured
reservoirs results in less than the envisaged production. Prolonged bandhs
and blockades in OIL`s operational areas in Chabua, Barekuri of Upper Assam
for 7 days.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Rajasthan)
|
Less than estimated production from existing wells. Less than estimated
oil production from Bhagyam wells.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Arunachal
onshore)
|
Water and sand ingress problem in wells & underperformance of newly
drilled wells.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Eastern Offshore-Ravva)
|
Natural decline of the field
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Gujarat Offshore-CB-OS/2)
|
Natural decline of the field.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Eastern Offshore-KG-DWN-98/3)
|
A total of 8 wells in D1, D3 and 2 wells in MA have ceased to flow due to
water/sand ingress.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Eastern Offshore-PY-1)
|
Production gain post work-over in Mercury is less than expected due to
water loading.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Eastern Offshore-PY-3)
|
Field under complete shutdown w.e.f 30.7.2011
after expiry of the contract for existing production facilities.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Western Offshore-M&S Tapti)
|
Tapti production is less than budget due to
slippage of Mid Tapti ERD wells and MTA-4 and 6
loading & shut-in of well STD-2.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs (Western Offshore-Panna-Mukta)
|
Oil production is lower due to underperformance of wells, unplanned
shutdown & intermittent flow from gas well PG # 1 &no flow from gas
well PG #10.
|
||||||||||
A statement showing Crude Oil Production during January, 2013 and
cumulatively for the period April- January, 2013 vis-à-vis 2011-12
planned production is at Annexure-I.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
II. A.
REFINERY PRODUCTION
|
|||||||||||
(IN TERMS OF
CRUDE THROUGHPUT)
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (in %age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year (in %age)
|
||||||
January, 2013*
|
15.643
|
16.043
|
102.6
|
2.6
|
10.5
|
||||||
April- January, 2013*
|
148.493
|
150.869
|
101.6
|
1.6
|
7.3
|
||||||
April- January, 2012
|
|
140.593
|
|
|
|
||||||
*: Provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
The crude throughput in IOC (Guwahati, Barauni, Haldia, Mathura &, Koyali), BPCL
(Kochi), HPCL (Mumbai), ONGC Tatipaka, RIL (Jamnagar) & Essar Oil Ltd. Vadinar refineries have exceeded their planned target.
|
|||||||||||
The crude throughput in
IOC (Digboi, Panipat
& Bongaigaon), BPCL (Mumbai), BORL (Bina), HPCL(Visakh), CPCL (Manali & Narimanam), NRL (Numaligarh) & MRPL (Mangalore) refineries was less
than their planned target.
|
|||||||||||
B. REASONS FOR
SHORTFALL :
|
|||||||||||
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
|
||||||||||
IOCL, Panipat
|
Throughput is in line with crude
availability.
|
||||||||||
IOCL, Bongaigaon
|
Throughput is in line with crude
availability.
|
||||||||||
HPCL, Visakh
|
Crude Throughput reduced due to
secondary units limitations
|
||||||||||
NRL, Numaligarh
|
Less crude receipt.
|
||||||||||
CPCL, Manali
|
CDU-III shutdown due to heavy naphtha
line leak.
|
||||||||||
CPCL, Narimanam
|
Less crude availability.
|
||||||||||
MRPL, Mangalore
|
CDU-III was under shutdown for six
days.
|
||||||||||
A statement showing refinery-wise
production during the month of January, 2013 and cumulatively for the period
April- January, 2013 vis-à-vis 2011-12 planned target is at
Annexure-II.
|
|||||||||||
III. REFINERY CAPACITY UTILISATION [excluding
RPL(SEZ)]
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Month
|
Utilisation (%)
|
Period
|
Utilisation (%)
|
||||||||
January, 2013*
|
106.7
|
April- January, 2013
|
101.6
|
||||||||
January, 2012
|
106.9
|
April- January, 2012
|
95.0
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The refinery-wise details of the capacity utilisation
during January, 2013 and cumulatively for the period April- January, 2013 vis-a-vis 2011-12 are given in Annexure-III.
|
|||||||||||
IV.
A. NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achieve-ment
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year
(%age)
|
||||||
January, 2013*
|
3541.706
|
3242.243
|
91.5
|
-8.5
|
-16.8
|
||||||
April- January, 2013*
|
34521.197
|
34619.236
|
100.3
|
0.3
|
-13.7
|
||||||
April- January, 2011
|
|
40093.680
|
|
|
|
||||||
MCM: Million Cubic Metres.
|
|
|
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
||||||
B.
COMPANY-WISE ACHIEVEMENT
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Company / State
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
|
|||||||
ONGC
|
2049.768
|
2004.841
|
97.8
|
-2.2
|
|||||||
Gujarat
|
91.127
|
147.273
|
161.6
|
|
|||||||
Rajasthan
|
1.258
|
1.091
|
86.7
|
|
|||||||
Andhra Pradesh
|
83.170
|
100.139
|
120.4
|
|
|||||||
Tamil Nadu
|
114.068
|
107.667
|
94.4
|
|
|||||||
Assam
|
38.634
|
35.490
|
91.9
|
|
|||||||
Tripura
|
121.032
|
67.175
|
55.5
|
|
|||||||
Mumbai High Offshore
|
1600.479
|
1546.006
|
96.6
|
|
|||||||
OIL
|
242.400
|
220.720
|
91.1
|
-8.9
|
|||||||
Assam
|
221.400
|
203.340
|
91.8
|
|
|||||||
Arunachal Pradesh
|
1.500
|
1.700
|
113.3
|
|
|||||||
Rajasthan
|
19.500
|
15.680
|
80.4
|
|
|||||||
PRIVATE/JVC
|
1249.538
|
1016.682
|
81.4
|
-18.6
|
|||||||
Onshore $
|
22.023
|
66.283
|
301.0
|
|
|||||||
Offshore
|
1227.515
|
950.399
|
77.4
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL
|
3541.706
|
3242.243
|
91.5
|
-8.5
|
|||||||
$: Including Coal Bed Methane
production.
|
|||||||||||
C.
REASONS FOR SHORTFALL
|
|||||||||||
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Tamil Nadu)
|
Less offtake by consumers.
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Offshore)
|
Delay in project execution of G-1 field.
Base potential effected due to lesser availability of inputs.
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Rajasthan)
|
Less offtake by consumers.
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Assam)
|
Production affected due to problem in heater treater. Lack of consumers.
|
||||||||||
ONGC (Tripura)
|
Lack of consumers.
|
||||||||||
OIL (Assam)
|
Higher average decline rate in matured
reservoirs results in less than the envisaged production. Prolonged bandhs
and blockades in OIL`s operational areas in Chabua, Barekuri of Upper Assam
for 7 days.
|
||||||||||
OIL (Rajasthan)
|
Low upliftment of
Natural Gas by M/s. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. (RRVUNL) during the month.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Arunchal
onshore)
|
Water and sand ingress problem in wells & underperformance of newly
drilled wells.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Gujarat Offshore-CB-OS/2)
|
Natural decline of the field.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( West Bengal)
|
Incidentally produced CBM is being sold in small quantities. Lower than
estimated gas production from the new wells.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Eastern Offshore-KG-DWN-98/3)
|
A total of 8 wells in D1, D3 and 2 wells in MA have ceased to flow due to
water/sand ingress.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Eastern Offshore-PY-1)
|
Production gain post work-over in Mercury is less than expected due to
water loading.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Eastern Offshore-PY-3)
|
Field under complete shutdown w.e.f 30.7.2011
after expiry of the contract for existing production facilities.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Western Offshore-M&S Tapti)
|
Tapti gas production is less than budget due to
slippage of Mid Tapti ERD wells and MTA-4 and 6
loading & shut-in of well STD-2.
|
||||||||||
Pvt./JVCs ( Western Offshore-Panna-Mukta)
|
Gas production is lower due to underperformance of wells, unplanned
shutdown & intermittent flow from gas well PG # 1 &no flow from gas
well PG #10.
|
||||||||||
A statement showing natural gas production during January, 2013 and
cumulatively for the period April- January, 2013 vis-à-vis 2011-12 is
at Annexure-IV.
RCJ/RKS
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dedicated and thanks to Greenko group CEO &; MD Shri Chalamalasetty Sir and Shri Mahesh Koli SIr, AM Green Ammonia (India) management Shri Gautam Reddy, Shri GVS ANAND, Shri K.Pradeep Mahadev, Shri VIJAY KUMAR (Site Incharge), Shri G.B.Rao, Shri PVSN Raju, Dr. V. Sunny John, Shri V. Parmekar ,Smt .Vani Tulsi,Shri B. B.K Uma Maheswar Rao, Shri T. Govind Babu, Shri P. Rajachand, Shri B.V Rao, Shri. LVV RAO ,Shri P.Srinivaslu Promotion- EHSQL-by Dr. A.N.GIRI- 28 Lakhs Viewed Thanks to NFCL.
Saturday 2 March 2013
Production Performance of Oil & Natural Gas sector for the month of January, 2013
Production Performance of Oil & Natural Gas sector for the month of January, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment