SAFETY QUESTION - AM I SAFE, UNSAFE OR IN DANGER?
It is a common principal in
response that where you are standing is critical to success when handling
hazardous materials. Recognizing the degree of danger of hazardous materials
will change the way an emergency responder functions. No one sits on a
box of burning explosives, or stands in the center of a busy interstate
highway because we know it's dangerous. Many of us will enter a tank or
approach a leaking cylinder without regard to our own safety. In order
to respond adequately we must weigh the risk to our own personal exposure
against the benefit of the response effort. This balance is to say the
least, delicate, and is in no way easy. Recognizing the degree of hazard
not only by it characteristics and hazards but quantified by the amount
or concentration can make a world of difference to the ultimate outcome.
It is a simple premise - Where you are standing in a chemical emergency
dictates the outcome. It is a three position emergency perception. Ask
yourself - Is it?:
SAFE Whether you use Ceilings, Time Weighted Averages or Short Term Exposure Limits, All these exposure limits have one thing in common, remain below them and the exposure is considered relatively safe. Of course that is Safe by all known information today. Exceed the recommended levels of any of these three and now you are no longer safe! Therefore you must be unsafe. Personal Protection must be used. Since the common responder does not carry instrumentation that can measure these levels it is better to use visible clues of safe. For example, are the chemicals in the container? Are they in the Controlled (SAFE) or Uncontrolled, spilt, released (UNSAFE) condition for determining an initial beginning point to responding. In the beginning of every hazardous materials emergency assume at least it is unsafe and try to eliminate atmospheres that are considered dangerous. Never let your guard down, if it's spilt consider it unsafe. When in doubt it’s unsafe! UNSAFE If it's not in a controlled state, It is not normal, and therefore it's by default unsafe. Anytime a chemical has gotten out of its container it will probably exceed any of the Worker Safety Measurements and there must be an increased level of hazard. Obviously there must be some form of protection needed. Most of the time it is usually respiratory protection but some skin protection may be needed if the substance is a contact hazard. The key hazard at unsafe level, the injuries are not of the fatal type because the concentration or length of exposure is usually short. Most are reversible, Head Aches, nausea, irritation to eyes, nose, or throat. The real hazard of unsafe is that the longer or more you are exposed to any substance the greater harm. Reversibility is also linked to the length of exposure. Any emergency response will be unsafe when the concentration rises or the length of exposure. It will go from unsafe to dangerous if the exposure (Time) or Concentration (Amount) grows excessively. This relationship of concentration and time as it is related to harm or dose is the heart of the dose/response curve. Harm is directly related to the concentration times the length of exposure or as Harm equals Concentration * Time (H = C x T). DANGEROUS The biggest question in emergency response is why does one chemical have the potential to kill or is lethal when sometimes the same chemical is spilled and responders clean it up with little or no problems, sometimes, although erroneously without respiratory protection. Because the concentration is not reached the dangerous level. But dangerous changes with each chemical. Some are dangerous because of fire, explosion, poison or corrosive. One commonality of all chemical exposure, the more you get the worse it gets. When concentration increase above these unsafe levels life threatening injuries can occur. Immediate monitoring atmospheres or visual clues are vital to life safety when the situation is dangerous. It is important to know when the concentrations are dangerous or life threatening. In addition the time limit is drastically reduced. First let’s ask, What is dangerous? Any definition of dangerous includes situations that are:
Unconsciousness Impaired judgment
Exposure to matter at a dangerous level has several definitions all are called Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) but all possess the dangerous characteristics of dangerous listed above. Immediately Dangerous To Life and Health - (NIOSH) "The maximum level from which a worker could escape without escape impairing symptoms or irreversible health effects within 30 minutes." Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health - (OSHA) " The airborne concentration of any toxic, corrosive or apshyxiant substance that poses and immediate threat to life, or causes irreversible or delayed effects or interferes with a responder’s ability to Escape the atmosphere" Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health - Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous waste Site Activities NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA
IDLH - Toxic
Chemicals you
wouldn’t even think of as lethal poison Ethanol (liquor) has an IDLH,
however it is very high because we tolerate it so well. Extremely toxic
substances have IDLH’s very low. Any time you are or suspect you are above
the IDLH it is dangerous-irreversible at the least and fatal at the worst.
These IDLH’s are Toxic. Treat them as such Examine the following poison
lines these are graphic illustrations that s toxic concentrations rise
and the TLV’s are exceeded harm occurs but they are reversible above the
IDLH dangerous exposures occur, some levels above the IDLH are lethal.
Many chemicals that are flammable have two IDLH’S Toxic and Flammable. It is a fact that when a chemical has reached it’s LEL it has been well above its (toxic) IDLH. The IDLH for toxic can be eliminated with a positive pressure Breathing Apparatus. But in a high concentration of Carbon Monoxide or Methanol responders could be burned to death before dying of the toxicity. The simplest method for determining flammable dangerous is to accept the premise we do not exceed 10% of the LEL. Responders are critically aware of the discrepancy in calibration and relative responses. 10% of LEL on the combustible gas indicator. Is dangerous. Never use the LEL as dangerous, its explosive (What does the "E" in LEL stand for), Explosion is energy and energy is always dangerous. Examine the poison lines below the most important issue is although the concentration has not reached the LEL or even 10% of the LEL it is well above the toxic exposure limits. Simple premise is any chemical that is toxic and flammable (all the organic solvents are) toxic hazards always precede flammable hazards. As any responder knows we need 21% oxygen to carry on normal activities. Below 19.5% the first affected organ is the Brain. You begin to have impaired judgment. This would be critical to your recognizing you’re in danger. Not knowing that you have to leave is a sure sign that further injury will occur. Many rescuers can be overcome in a few breaths breathes of anoxic (low oxygen) atmosphere. Low oxygen atmospheres are the most common IDLH encountered and the most responsible for deaths of responders. The Oxygen line shows the increasing deviation of an oxygen deficient atmosphere. Many focus on low oxygen atmospheres but oxygen enriched atmospheres are just as dangerous. These atmospheres although not common seriously increase the fire hazard. Oxygen enriched atmospheres are dangerous because they possess fire and explosion hazards. A safety tip is oxygen atmospheres do not exist under normal conditions. Responders encountering any oxygen increased situation should use extreme caution. Any of these atmospheres are recognizable if instrumentation is available. A specific reading will give responders immediate feedback. But too often there is no ready numbers early in an incident. We then must use our common sense and look for visible indications of dangerous. First assume there are only two locations as pill can occur. Inside and Outside. This at first seems simple, but upon closer examination it is the key to IDLH. To be IDLH outside requires large quantities of matter or possess energy. The only exception is extreme poisons can be dangerous. Outside Large Container or Vessel involved in the Emergency Large liquid leaks Below grade victim or release (Inside or Outside) Below grade victim or release (Inside or Outside) Artificial or Natural Barriers (Vapors Trapped) Highly Toxic Chemicals (Very Low IDLH’s Very Low PEL’s) Heavy Odors or Strong Sensory Warnings Energy Is Always Dangerous Unknowns Although all dangerous situations possess deadly consequences, there is a field hierarchy that we should respect.
Energy Flammable or Oxygen Enriched (Both Explosive) Toxic Low Oxygen Always be on the look out for any of these situations. An IDLH situation will be cause for difficult decisions to be made. There is a rough degree of danger hen dealing with IDLH situations. This is not etched in stone but serves as a guide. Low oxygen is common but it is the easiest to protect from simple SCBA eliminates the hazard. Unknowns usually turn out to be benign but they cause great concern until identified. Energy usually is a higher degree of danger. Although Rapid intervention is sometimes necessary by responders if the victim can be saved. However, the numbers of victims must not increase after the arrival of the first responder on the scene. Your involvement must favorably change or alter the outcome for the better. You must be part of the solution not increase the problem. | ||||||||
Dedicated Team spirit and thanks to Greenko group CEO and MD Shri Chalamalasetty Sir and Shri Mahesh Koli SIr, AM Green management Shri Gautam Reddy, Shri GVS ANAND, Shri K.Pradeep Shri VIJAY KUMAR (Site Incharge), Shri G.B.Rao, Shri PVSN Raju, Dr. V. Sunny John, Shri V. Parmekar ,Smt .Vani Tulsi,Shri B. B.K Uma Maheswar Rao, Shri T. Govind Babu, Shri P. Rajachand, Shri B.V Rao, Shri. LVV RAO ,Shri P.Srinivaslu Promotion- EHSQL-by Dr. A.N.GIRI- 28.1 Lakhs Viewed Thanks to NFCL.
Saturday, 9 April 2016
SAFETY QUESTION - AM I SAFE, UNSAFE OR IN DANGER?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment