Sections 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 are
not included in the Demo file
|
||||
4.1 General requirements
|
||||
4.1
|
Is the EMS established, documented,
implemented, maintained, and continually improved in accordance with ISO
14001 requirements?
|
This
catch-all question can only be answered at the end of the whole audit.
Typically, if there is a noncompliance here, there must be other major
noncompliances somewhere else in the system. If so, reference them in the
‘Auditor Notes’ field.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Is the scope of the EMS defined?
|
Does the EMS
apply to the entire organization and all its activities? Are any operating
units, locations, or activities excluded? Are these exclusions, if any,
documented? Are the exclusions reasonable and justified?
|
|
|
4.2 Environmental Policy
|
||||
4.2
|
Has the top management
defined the environmental policy?
§
Is it appropriate to the nature, scale and environmental
impacts of the organization’s activities, products and services?
§
Does it include a commitment to continual improvement and
prevention of pollution?
§
Does it include a commitment to comply with legal
requirements and with other requirements to which the organization
subscribes?
§
Does it provide the framework for setting environmental
objectives and targets?
§
Is it documented, implemented and maintained?
§
Is it communicated to all persons working for or on behalf of
the organization?
§
Is it available to the public?
|
Is the policy addressing the most important and severe
environmental impacts (e.g. is nontrivial)?
Are there explicit commitments to continual improvement?
How are commitments to the prevention of pollution articulated? Are any
specific types of pollution named?
Are there explicit commitments to comply with legal
requirement? Are there any other requirements to which the organization
subscribes (for example, industry guidelines)?
Are the policy goals sufficiently specific, so that
particular objectives can be set for achieving these goals? Is there a clear
relationship between the objectives and targets set by the organization and
its environmental policy?
How is the policy documented? Is it authorized and/or
approved by top management? Is the policy regularly reviewed (management
reviews)?
How is the policy communicated to personnel? Is it also
communicated to relevant agents, subcontractors, and other external
personnel? Is the policy explained? How?
How the policy is made available to the public
(internet, displayed in lobby)?
|
|
|
4.3 Planning
|
||||
4.3.1 Environmental aspects
|
||||
4.3.1
|
Is there a documented
procedure to identify environmental aspects of the organization’s activities,
products and services that the organization controls and those that it can
influence?
Does the procedure consider
planned or new developments, or new or modified activities, products and
services?
Are environmental aspects
identified?
|
Who is responsible for identifying environmental aspects
(team, individual)? Are there instructions/training explaining how to do it?
How is it ensured that environmental aspects are also identified for planned
or new activities, products and services?
How many aspects have been identified? Is it a broad
pool of aspects that covers all activities, products and services? Are there
included ‘external’ aspects that the organization can influence
(purchased/subcontracted products and services)?
How are aspects documented?
|
|
|
4.3.1
|
Is there a documented
procedure to determine aspects that have or can have significant impacts on
the environment (significant environmental aspects)?
|
Is there a documented method for determining
significance of environmental aspects (risk analysis)? Is it objective? Are
all aspects considered? Is there a provision for reevaluating significance of
aspects in light of new developments?
How many significant aspects have been identified? How
are they documented?
|
|
|
4.3.1
|
Are significant
environmental aspects taken into account in establishing, implementing and
maintaining the EMS?
|
Is there a clear relationship between significant
aspects and the environmental policy? Are significant aspects taken into
account when setting environmental objectives and targets? Is there a system
for monitoring environmental performance with regard to significant aspects?
|
|
|
4.3.2 Legal and other requirements
|
||||
4.3.2
|
Is there a documented
procedure to identify and ensure access to the applicable legal requirements
and other requirements to which the organization subscribes?
Does the procedure determine
how these requirements apply to the environmental aspects?
|
Is there a list, matrix, etc. of applicable legal
requirements? How is it determined which requirements apply (checklist,
expert input, etc.)? Who is responsible for determining which requirements
apply? How the list is kept up to date (periodical review)?
Are there any other requirements to which the
organization subscribes (agreements, contracts, codes of practice, etc.)?
What is the link between legal and other requirements
and environmental aspects? Are there examples of any specific significant
environmental aspects that correspond to specific legal and other
requirements?
|
|
|
4.3.2
|
Are the legal and other
requirements taken into account in establishing, implementing and maintaining
the EMS?
|
How are legal and other requirements accounted for in
the EMS (could be the environmental policy, significant aspects, objectives,
programs, performance monitoring, management reviews, etc.)?
|
|
|
4.3.3 Objectives, targets and programs
|
||||
4.3.3
|
Are there documented,
implemented and maintained environmental objectives and targets?
Are they established at all
relevant functions and levels within the organization?
Are objectives and targets
consistent with the environmental policy, including the commitments to:
§
Prevention of pollution;
§
Compliance with legal and other requirements, and;
§
Continual Improvement?
Are
objectives and targets measurable (where practical)?
|
How are objectives and targets documented? How many
objectives and targets are currently established and are actively implemented
(pursued)? Do all relevant functions and levels participate in achieving
objectives? Are there any organizational units, functions or levels excluded?
Why?
Which specific objectives relate to prevention of
pollution and to compliance with legal and other requirements? Are objectives
and targets aiming to improve environmental control, management and/or
performance (objective to maintain performance at current level is also OK)?
Are environmental targets measurable? When not obvious,
are there instructions explaining how to measure status and progress? Are
there any objectives that cannot be measured? How are the targets defined?
How is it determined whether the target has been achieved?
|
|
|
4.3.3
|
In the process of
establishing and reviewing objectives and targets is there a due
consideration of:
§
Legal and other requirements;
§
Significant environmental aspects;
§
Technological options;
§
Financial, operational and business requirements; and
§
Views of interested parties?
|
Who establishes environmental objectives? How, and how
often are objectives reviewed? Is the top management actively involved in
setting and reviewing environmental objectives? Do (management) personnel
responsible for setting and reviewing environmental objectives have access to
information related to legal and other requirements; significant
environmental aspects; technology and technical issues; financial,
operational and business requirements; and views of interested parties? How
is this information provided? How is it ensured that the information is
current?
|
|
|
4.3.3
|
Are there established,
implemented and maintained programs for achieving objectives and targets?
Do these programs define
the
§
responsibility,
§
means, and ;
§
time-frame
for
achieving objectives and targets?
|
For each environmental objective, is there a program for
achieving the objective? Does it designate a person/function for implementing
and achieving the objective? Is it clear what means and methods shall be used
to achieve the objective? Is there a timeframe for achieving it? Is progress
toward achieving the objective measured at intermediate stages? How is it
determined that the objective has been achieved? Are those programs
documented? How?
Are the programs amended (as appropriate) to include new
projects, activities and developments?
|
|
|
Sections 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 are
not included in the Demo file
|
Dedicated and thanks to Greenko group CEO &; MD Shri Chalamalasetty Sir and Shri Mahesh Koli SIr, AM Green Ammonia (India) management Shri Gautam Reddy, Shri GVS ANAND, Shri K.Pradeep Mahadev, Shri VIJAY KUMAR (Site Incharge), Shri G.B.Rao, Shri PVSN Raju, Dr. V. Sunny John, Shri V. Parmekar ,Smt .Vani Tulsi,Shri B. B.K Uma Maheswar Rao, Shri T. Govind Babu, Shri P. Rajachand, Shri B.V Rao, Shri. LVV RAO ,Shri P.Srinivaslu Promotion- EHSQL-by Dr. A.N.GIRI- 28 Lakhs Viewed Thanks to NFCL.
Saturday 16 June 2012
ISO 14001:2004 INTERNAL AUDIT CHECKLIST
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment