Ammonia
The
chemical and petrochemical sector is the largest industrial energy
consumer. Ammonia production is responsible for about 17% of the energy
consumed in this sector. In 2004, the ammonia manufacturing industry
consumed 5.6 EJ of fossil fuels, of which 2.7 EJ was for energy and 2.9
EJ for feedstock use.1 Although the energy use per tonne of
ammonia has decreased by 30% over the last thirty years, adopting best
available technologies (BAT) worldwide can further reduce energy use by
20-25%1, 2 and decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 30%.2
About
80 percent of ammonia produced is used as fertilizer and is applied
either directly or converted to solid fertilizers before application
(e.g. urea, ammonia nitrate). The remaining 20 percent is used in a
variety of industrial applications, such as in the manufacture of
plastics, fibers, explosives, amines, amides and other organic nitrogen
compounds (IPTS/EC, 2007 p.35). Nitric acid, urea and sodium cyanide are
the main products derived from ammonia. The fertilizer industry is a
major energy consumer, responsible for about 2-3 percent of global
energy consumption (IPTS/EC, 2007 p.3). Production of ammonia accounts
for about 80-90 percent of the energy used in the manufacture of
fertilizers (IEA, 2007 p.60).
Between 2000 and 2011, global ammonia production increased by 25 percent, from 131 million tonnes ammonia to 164 million tonnes. This represents an annual increase of about 2 percent on average (USGS, 2012). Over the past 15 years the largest (absolute) growth has been in China, where overall production increased by 65 percent. Trinidad and Tobago, India and Russia have also experienced large (absolute) growths in ammonia production over the past 15 years. In the United States, the production capacity of ammonia significantly decreased over this period by about 30 percent. Figure 1 shows the historical ammonia production trends since 1996.
Figure 1: Historical ammonia production trends (USGS, 2012)
Natural gas, naphta, heavy fuel oil, coal, coke oven gas and refinery gas can be used as feedstock in ammonia production. Globally, 72 percent of ammonia is produced using steam reforming of natural gas (IEA, 2012 p.329) and is the least energy intensive option. Coal is predominantly used in China and is generally characterized by high energy intensities. The table below provides the estimated distribution of feedstock use in selected countries.
a: Based on Table 3 under benchmarks section; b: China Chemical Energy Conservation Technology Association (CCECT), 2011; c: Fertilizer Association of India (2013)
Developments in Energy Use in Ammonia Plants
Increasing feedstock and energy prices in combination with increased competitiveness have forced many ammonia producers to revamp or modernize older and inefficient plants. Most of the revamp projects that have taken place were combined with a moderate increase in capacity (IPTS/EC, 2007 p.35).
The first single-train ammonia plant had an energy use of about 45 GJ/t NH3 (Ullmann’s, 2011 p.229). An energy efficient ammonia plant is characterized by an energy use of less than 29 GJ/t NH3. Significant developments that contributed to the major reduction in energy use were improvements in the steam reforming section, such as heat recovery from the primary reformer flue-gases, the installation of a pre-reformer, increased reformer operating pressure, lower steam to carbon ratios and shifting the primary reformer duty to the secondary reformer. Improvements have also taken place in other aspects of ammonia manufacture. For example, in shift conversion with the use of improved catalysts, in CO2 removal with the use of new solvents, and in ammonia synthesis with the use of improved catalysts and improved reactor designs. More developments consist of higher efficiency turbines and compressors, improved process control and process optimization.
The applicability rate of energy efficiency improving technologies for different countries is hard to determine as it strongly depends on the level of technology currently adopted. An estimate of the share of plants to which several revamps can be applied in the European Union, the United States and in India are given in the table below (Rafiqul et al., 2005).
India is currently the second-largest ammonia producer. Ammonia production is responsible for more than 50 percent of the Indian chemical and petrochemical industry's energy use. About 10 percent of ammonia is produced with oil-based processes (see Table 3). In 2010, the average energy use for Indian ammonia production was estimated at 37.7 GJ/tonne of ammonia, while the energy use for the best available technology using natural gas was 28 GJ/tonne of ammonia. The use of oil as feedstock is responsible for half of the gap in these energy intensities (IEA, 2011 p.43). In India, gas-based ammonia-producing plants consume on average 36.5 t NH3, while naphtha-based plants consume 39 t NH3 and fuel oil-based plants 48-87 t NH3 (IEA, 2007 p.85). Further information on the historical developments and future projections regarding energy intensity and CO2 emissions of Indian ammonia plants can be found .
A shift to natural gas along with the implementation of the best available technology would result in around 25 percent reduction in energy use. In recent years, the increase in oil prices resulted in the rapid decline of oil shares in favor of natural gas. A switch from oil-based to natural-gas based ammonia production in India may also be favored in the future with the recent discoveries of offshore natural gas reserves (IEA, 2011 p.43).
Between 2000 and 2011, global ammonia production increased by 25 percent, from 131 million tonnes ammonia to 164 million tonnes. This represents an annual increase of about 2 percent on average (USGS, 2012). Over the past 15 years the largest (absolute) growth has been in China, where overall production increased by 65 percent. Trinidad and Tobago, India and Russia have also experienced large (absolute) growths in ammonia production over the past 15 years. In the United States, the production capacity of ammonia significantly decreased over this period by about 30 percent. Figure 1 shows the historical ammonia production trends since 1996.
Figure 1: Historical ammonia production trends (USGS, 2012)
Natural gas, naphta, heavy fuel oil, coal, coke oven gas and refinery gas can be used as feedstock in ammonia production. Globally, 72 percent of ammonia is produced using steam reforming of natural gas (IEA, 2012 p.329) and is the least energy intensive option. Coal is predominantly used in China and is generally characterized by high energy intensities. The table below provides the estimated distribution of feedstock use in selected countries.
|
Worlda
|
Japan
|
Benelux
|
Germany
|
USA
|
Brazil
|
Canada
|
China
|
France
|
India
|
Italy
|
Korea
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Taiwan
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Natural gas |
72.4%
|
100%
|
100%
|
67%
|
97%
|
100%
|
100%
|
24%b
|
69%
|
80%c
|
90%
|
N/A
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Naphtha |
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
9%c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
4.3%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
33%
|
3%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1%b
|
31%
|
10%c
|
10%
|
100%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Coal |
22.4%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
75%b
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Developments in Energy Use in Ammonia Plants
Increasing feedstock and energy prices in combination with increased competitiveness have forced many ammonia producers to revamp or modernize older and inefficient plants. Most of the revamp projects that have taken place were combined with a moderate increase in capacity (IPTS/EC, 2007 p.35).
The first single-train ammonia plant had an energy use of about 45 GJ/t NH3 (Ullmann’s, 2011 p.229). An energy efficient ammonia plant is characterized by an energy use of less than 29 GJ/t NH3. Significant developments that contributed to the major reduction in energy use were improvements in the steam reforming section, such as heat recovery from the primary reformer flue-gases, the installation of a pre-reformer, increased reformer operating pressure, lower steam to carbon ratios and shifting the primary reformer duty to the secondary reformer. Improvements have also taken place in other aspects of ammonia manufacture. For example, in shift conversion with the use of improved catalysts, in CO2 removal with the use of new solvents, and in ammonia synthesis with the use of improved catalysts and improved reactor designs. More developments consist of higher efficiency turbines and compressors, improved process control and process optimization.
The applicability rate of energy efficiency improving technologies for different countries is hard to determine as it strongly depends on the level of technology currently adopted. An estimate of the share of plants to which several revamps can be applied in the European Union, the United States and in India are given in the table below (Rafiqul et al., 2005).
| Type of Energy Efficiency Improvement | Applicability Rate (share of plants in percentage) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Euoropean Union | United States | India | |
| Reforming (large improvements) | 10 | 15 | 10 |
| Reforming (moderate improvements) | 20 | 25 | 20 |
| CO2 removal section | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Low pressure ammonia synthesis | 90 | 90 | 90 |
| Hydrogen recovery | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Improved process control | 30 | 50 | 30 |
| Proces Integration | 10 | 25 | 20 |
China is the largest and most energy intensive ammonia producer in the
world. In 2011, China produced 51 Mt of ammonia, accounting for 31
percent of world production. In 2010, Chinese ammonia plants had an
estimated average energy intensity of 49.1 t NH3. Although
the Chinese gas-based ammonia production process is amongst the most
energy efficient in the world, it only accounts for 24 percent of
Chinese ammonia production. In 2010, about 75 percent of the ammonia in
China was produced with the coal-based process. The average energy
intensity of the Chinese coal-based ammonia producing plants is 54 t NH3. Oil-based production in China accounts for only 8 percent of total production.
The energy efficiency of ammonia production depends on the feedstock
type that is being used and the plant production scale (IEA, 2007 p.84).
Coal-based ammonia production in China takes place primarily in
small-scale plants (90%). The remaining 10 percent is produced in
medium-scale plants. The energy intensity of these medium-scale
coal-based plants is about 55 GJ/t NH3, while small-scale coal-based plants consume about 53 GJ/t NH3.
It is not clear why small-scale plants consume slightly less energy
than medium-scale ones. In China, a shift to natural gas is not
foreseeable due to recent major investments in coal-based processing
plants (IEA, 2009b p.19). On the contrary, higher future natural gas
prices may result in a wider uptake of coal-based processes (IEA, 2007
p.84).India is currently the second-largest ammonia producer. Ammonia production is responsible for more than 50 percent of the Indian chemical and petrochemical industry's energy use. About 10 percent of ammonia is produced with oil-based processes (see Table 3). In 2010, the average energy use for Indian ammonia production was estimated at 37.7 GJ/tonne of ammonia, while the energy use for the best available technology using natural gas was 28 GJ/tonne of ammonia. The use of oil as feedstock is responsible for half of the gap in these energy intensities (IEA, 2011 p.43). In India, gas-based ammonia-producing plants consume on average 36.5 t NH3, while naphtha-based plants consume 39 t NH3 and fuel oil-based plants 48-87 t NH3 (IEA, 2007 p.85). Further information on the historical developments and future projections regarding energy intensity and CO2 emissions of Indian ammonia plants can be found .
A shift to natural gas along with the implementation of the best available technology would result in around 25 percent reduction in energy use. In recent years, the increase in oil prices resulted in the rapid decline of oil shares in favor of natural gas. A switch from oil-based to natural-gas based ammonia production in India may also be favored in the future with the recent discoveries of offshore natural gas reserves (IEA, 2011 p.43).
No comments:
Post a Comment