I. Findings
1. Reforms have already been undertaken in many sectors/areas
and have benefited the economy in a big way.
The benefits that have accrued in the civil aviation, telecommunications
and the industrial sector are notable. Prices of many electronic items like
colour TVs, fridges, digital cameras, mobile phones, DVD players etc have
either remained the same or fallen drastically. The price of computers has
crashed from Rs. 1 lakh in the 1980s to Rs.10000 today, while the quality has
unimaginably improved. Airfares and telecom rates have nose-dived due to
cutthroat competition. Liberalization in the area of radio and T.V.
broadcasting has led to coming up of several private channels. Productivity has
gone up in leaps and bounds with the infusion of global technology and
management techniques. Financial liberalization has brought down interest rates
and easy availability of consumer finance. Many new job opportunities have been
created in India due to outsourcing of many jobs to India by foreign
countries. Inflation has either come
down or remained modest, even though international oil prices have been
spiraling during the last few years, due to competition and rise in productivity.
Even though there has been wide spread increase in prices of raw materials
during the last 2 to 3 years, yet it has not produced a big burst of global
inflation. Consumer has become the king in the liberalized era.
2. The
increase in Index of overall employment in the country as a whole during
1991-2001 has been much higher than the increases during the decades 1971-81
and 1981-91. The same trend is observed
with regard to urban employment and rural employment in the country as a whole. This clearly shows that the economic reforms
did not lead to “jobless growth”.
3. The
overall participation ratio as well as the urban and rural participation
ratios, in the country as a whole, has been continuously increasing since
1971. This once again proves the fallacy
of the argument that economic reforms led to “jobless growth”.
4. The scenario with regard to states depict that almost all
the states experienced positive impact of reforms on overall employment. The same is observed with regard to
urban employment and rural employment in various states. Some of the smaller states have gained
relatively more than the bigger states.
5. Majority of the states and union
territories registered increases in their overall as well as urban and rural
participation ratios during 1991-2001, thereby disproving the claim of ‘jobless
growth’ by opponents of economic reforms.
6.
Among the 143 selected towns, the Index of
workers increased during 1991-2001 in all the towns except one (Thoothukkudi in
Tamil Nadu). Out of the 143 selected
towns, the increase in Index of workers during 1991-2001 has been more than the
increase during 1981-1991 in 108 towns, i.e. in about 75% of the 143
towns. Since there has been higher
increase in Index of workers during 1991-2001 in 75% of the towns and there has
been increase in Index of workers in all the selected towns, except one, during
1991-2001, it can be safely concluded that there was positive impact on
employment in urban areas of the country.
7.
The
analysis of trends in participation ratios in the 143 selected towns indicates
that the participation ratio increased during 1991-2001 in 124 towns, that is
in about 87% of the 143 selected towns. In three towns, the ratio remained
almost the same. In case of the remaining
16 towns, where the participation ratio declined, the reason could be
attributed to migration to other towns because of availability of better
employment opportunities. The number of towns having participation ratio
between 30 and 40 per cent increased from 27 in 1971 to 40 in 1981, 52 in 1991
and then made a big jump to 80 in 2001.
This once again shows that almost all the towns gained due to economic
reforms, as far as employment is concerned.
Recommendations
There
is a feeling among many sections of the society that economic reforms help only
the rich and not the poor. The reality
is actually the opposite. Reforms lead to competition, which in turn results in
good quality of goods and services being made available at cheaper prices. Protectionism protects the domestic producers
at the cost of consumers. In a
democracy, it is the consumer who needs to be protected and not the
producer. When the domestic producers
face global competition, they will be pressurized into producing good quality
of goods at lower prices. India has been overactive in the field of
industry for very long and, therefore, the opening up of the economy was a step
in the right direction.
Economic reforms that have already been
undertaken in some of the areas/ sectors like civic aviation, communications,
power, industry, fiscal policy, etc. have pushed up growth and employment. The reform process needs to be vigorously
pursued and accelerated to take India into immeasurable heights in prosperity
and put India in a highly respectable place in the hierarchy of developed
nations. An economy performs at its peak efficiency and sustains it, if a
competitive environment is created and sustained. This calls were more vigorous reforms. The
following recommendations are made in this connection.
1.
Free flow of Foreign Investment
A huge investment is required to improve
infrastructure facilities in India. The existing infrastructure facilities are
neither adequate in quantity nor satisfactory in quality. The central and state
governments are already facing severe financial crunch and cannot be expected
to spend huge funds to provide infrastructure facilities in adequate quantity
and quality of international standards. In fact, there are some states where
the payment of monthly salaries to government teachers and doctors get delayed
due to paucity of funds. Under such circumstances, opposing foreign investments
does not seem to be justified. Foreign investments need to be welcomed in as
many sectors as possible. Foreign investment brings better technology, helps in
human capital formation, increases exports, and improves the productivity and
efficiency of resource use. In fact, there should be free flow of foreign investment in all the areas to
create competitive markets and improve efficiency.
Foreign
investment in coal mining, insurance and retail trade need to be increased /
allowed. Housing is a sector which requires huge investment and therefore,
foreign investment definitely needed to be encouraged in a big way in this
sector to eliminate housing shortage in India. Recently, the government has
opened the construction sector to 100% FDI.
This will not only go a long way in speedier development of housing and
commercial premises such as shopping malls, hotels, resorts, hospitals, educational
institutions, recreational facilities and urban infrastructure, but the quality
of real estate will also improve.
2. Privatization of Power Sector
The power sector needs to be completely privatized and
greater competition has to be encouraged so that power becomes easily available
in plenty to all and that too at cheaper rates.
Power is the basic input for all industries, and therefore industrial
production will increase by leaps and bounds, if power becomes cheaper and its
continuous availability both in terms of quality and quantity can be ensured.
If domestic power becomes very cheap, even a common man will be able to install
an air-conditioner in his house during summer and use heat convectors and
geysers during winter. This will give a big boost to industries manufacturing
such items. All obstacles that come in the way of private participation in
generation, transmission and distribution of electricity have to be eliminated.
Privatisation of power will help in eliminating theft and
misuse of power. In Delhi, it was observed by the New Delhi Municipal Council
(NDMC) in some of the slums located in its area, that slum dwellers who steal
electricity not only use it for running electrical appliances like TV, fridge
etc, but also for small scale industries. In fact, the agency has estimated
that it is losing Rs.2 crore every month due to such pilferage. It seems
stealing of electricity is also being done by affluent people and industries on
a large scale. In many states, theft of electricity is as high as 50%. It has
to be noted that theft of power not only results in loss of revenue to the
supplying agency but also results in frequent power failures due to
overloading, thereby causing inconvenience to the genuine consumers. Sometimes,
the transformers get burnt because of overloading, forcing the supplying agency
to resort to load shedding. Stealing of electricity can also cause grid failure
resulting in a major break down of power over large areas. Further, theft of power results in higher
tariff for electricity, thereby putting the burden on honest consumers.
3. Discontinuance of Free Power Supply
Electricity is not like rain that
drops from the heavens free of charge. Substantial costs are involved in
producing, transmitting and distributing electricity. Giving free power to farmers means less money
with the state government. That
translates into fewer schools, medicines, roads and jobs. Free power is a
cancer that spreads and has many other ill effects. It results in over
consumption of power. Since power is free but intermittent, farmers do not
bother to switch off their pump sets. Further, since power is free, many
farmers who have obsolete, power-intensive pump sets; do not bother to replace
them with energy efficient ones. Free power encourages farmers to grow
water-intensive crops, like rice, sugarcane, even in low-rainfall areas, as
they can draw any amount of ground water without paying penny, The over-pumping
of ground water ultimately results in falling of water table. When the water
table falls below 30 to 40 feet, it will not be possible to draw water by using
centrifugal pumps, which are used by small and marginal farmers, and one has to
use costly submersible pumps, used by rich farmers, to lift ground water. Free
power also deprives the poor of drinking water and small farmers of irrigation.
When the water table falls because of over-pumping, no water is left in shallow
dry wells supplying drinking water and small-scale irrigation for small farms.
In coastal areas, excessive use of ground water for irrigation leads to drying
up of aquifers and infiltration of seawater in coastal area resulting in
permanent ruining of aquifers. Hence, free power is not free. It is paid by
depriving people of drinking water, and by rendering useless the centrifugal
pumps of small farmers. It is paid for by the poor, the illiterate and the
sick. It is paid for by environmental
destruction.
.
4. Reducing Import Duties
There is a general feeling that
exports are a good thing and imports are a bad thing. In fact, this is not true,
as a country exports what it has surplus of, and imports what it does not have.
Hence, exports are more valuable than imports only because they provide the
purchasing power to finance imports. If
a nation does not require to import anything, then there is no point in
exporting also. However, in reality, such a situation does not exist.
Since, it will not be possible
to do away with imports, import duties should be kept to the minimum to benefit
domestic consumers. A point that is put
forward frequently against reducing import duties is that it will bankrupt
domestic producers and will render their employees jobless. This may be true, but it has to be noted that
the beneficiaries will vastly exceed the losers, and the gains will exceed the
losses. Further, the only way to keep
improving productivity and living standards is to keep shifting investment and
labour from less productive to more productive activities. This may cause some displacement of labour. However, the gains accruing from an import duty cut to consumers will be so
large that it can easily finance a safety net for the displaced, as such a
safety net will cost only a small portion of the benefit. Import duties should
not be more than 10% to eliminate smuggling and to force the domestic
industries to compete with foreign companies and produce goods with high
quality.
5.
Reducing Subsidies
Financial
condition of state governments as well as the central government has to be very
sound if they are required to play the role
effectively as facilitator, regulator, and watch-dog. This calls for
giving up “populist measures” whatever their form may be. . Reducing revenue expenditure, subsidies, having proper user charges are the
need of the day. Subsidies should
be brought down drastically by following a target-oriented approach (poor). Subsidies for crop support prices,
fertilizers, irrigation and power to farmers be reduced so that funds can be
released for public investment in rural infrastructure including irrigation,
roads, agricultural extension and research. When government continues giving
subsidies over a long period, it gives rise to having a feeling among people
that they have a right to such subsidies and therefore, governments find it
very difficult to withdraw them for political reasons. However, political will
should not come in the way of reducing / withdrawing subsidies, keeping in view
the need to achieve fiscal discipline so that governments can fulfill its
responsibility in a better way in social sectors such as education and health.
Subsidies not only result in shortage of funds with the government, but also
lead to many ills including
environmental hazards. The pricing
policy of public agencies with regard to the services being provided by them
should be cost-based and the user charges should be such that they cover the
cost of services and their maintenance.
It
is not necessary that subsidies always help the poor. In fact, in case of
certain susidies, the rich benefits more and the poorest may not benefit at all
. A World Bank analysis of power subsidies in Andhra Pradesh showed that large
farmers get an implicit subsidy of over Rs. 50,000/- per year, small farmers
got around Rs. 8,000/- a year, and landless laborers got nothing at all.
6.
Service Tax
There is no doubt that the services sector has been growing rapidly over
the past few years and the introduction of service tax to bring this sector
under the tax net was a step in the right direction. Today, the services sector
accounts for the largest share (52%) in country’s GDP. However, its
contribution to the government/s exchequer has been far from commensurate. In
2003-04, revenue from service tax constituted only 3% of the union tax revenue
and was expected to increase to 5% in 2004-05. The revenue from service tax can
be increased if more and more services can be brought under the tax net. It has
to be noted here that there can be large scale tax evasion as far as service
tax is concerned, because services are intangible and are provided by large
groups of organized as well as unorganized service providers including
retailers who are scattered across the country. It may be easier to widen the
scope but tax-evasion may increase further. It is felt that the rate of service
tax can be brought down to reduce tax-evasion and also to give relief to the
consumers, as the present rate of 10.2 % (as in 2005), seems to be on the much
higher side.
7. Administrative Reforms
Economic reforms are underway, but to make
them fully successful, they need to be accompanied by drastic administrative
reforms. It is said that if one buys a Mercedez, or plan a big wedding in
Mumbai, the mafia will knock at the door demanding protection money. One cannot get a completion certificate for
his house without greasing the palms of the concerned officials in the local
bodies/development authorities. A survey has revealed that four – fifths of the
population is unaware of any economic reform at all. This is because the face of the government seen
by the ordinary villager is that of the patwari, the police “thana”, the SEB
linesman, and this bunch of public servants remains totally unreformed.
The legal system, police system and
the bureaucracy need to be completely overhauled. A legal system that delivers verdicts within
one or two years, that stops endless appeals and actually delivers justice,
needs to be in place. Criminals evade
the law by using muscle power and/or political interference. What is needed is an independent criminal
investigation branch in every state with autonomy akin to that of the Election
Commission, which can prosecute crooked politicians, bureaucrats and
businessmen with impunity.
8.
Privatization
A private company definitely performs better
because of better management, supervision, non-political interference, adoption
of latest technology, highly qualified, skilled and dedicated personnel, etc.
The production and productivity in BALCO, which was a leading aluminium
industry in the public sector, has gone up very high after privatization. There
are today many public sector companies, which are sick, and these need to be
privatized immediately. Even profit-making enterprises can be privatized to
push up efficiency and thereby the growth of the economy.
Government
can raise huge revenues by privatizing public enterprises and the proceeds can
be used to provide better services in social sectors, The loss-making public
enterprises add to the tax burden of people and such units exist on budgetary
support. Sometimes, privatization can help the government to increase
infrastructure in the same area. For example, India needs about 500 airports
today, but has only 80 at present. By privatizing bigger airports, the
government can earn huge revenue, which can be used to develop new airports and
improve the existing small airports.
In
order to accelerate growth, it is indispensable to raise investment in a big
way and this is attainable only through a massive private participation in all
the sectors. Over time, public sector
should slowly vacate from all physical infrastructure and other commercial
sectors and enter in a large scale into investment in human
infrastructure. Infrastructure plays a
critical role in the growth of the country be it the agricultural, manufacturing
or service sectors. A greater degree of
private participation in infrastructure should be ensured after creating a
better regulatory environment. This will
help in increasing efficiency, investment, levying proper user charges,
eliminate political interference and budgetary constraints. Private projects in poorer and commercially
unviable areas as well as in roads, sanitation and waste management where
financing by user charges would not be feasible, could be publicly subsidized,
with a procedure for minimum subsidy bidding to choose the service provider.
9. Private Sector Participation in Drinking
Water Supply
Today,
private sector is participating in the drinking water sector in terms of
producing “packaged drinking water”. But, only the rich can afford to purchase
“packaged drinking water” which costs between Rs. 10-15 a litre. What is required is to invite private sector
to participate in big water supply schemes to supply water to the people at
reasonable price. The private sector can
play a big role in setting up big desalination plants in coastal areas where
there is scarcity of drinking water. The
city of Chennai is a classic example in this case. Water is a basic need of human being and no
time should be lost in ensuring supply of drinking water is abundance and in
good quality. This can be possible if
proper incentives are given to the private sector to enable them to come
forward in a big way.
10. Private Sector in Road Construction and
Maintenance
Good and broad roads everywhere go a long
way in achieving balanced regional development because they facilitate easy
accessibility to all settlements.
Unfortunately, roads require huge investment and therefore even after
more than 50 years of independence, many of the urban and rural settlements do
not have proper roads. The scope for involving the private sector in
constructing and maintaining not only Highways but also urban and rural roads
needs to be explored.
11.
Reducing Fiscal Deficit
The
fiscal deficits in the Centre and States are very high. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget
Management Act mandates the elimination of the revenue deficit by 2008-09. The Act should be vigorously implemented to
bring about fiscal consolidation so that funds can be found for public and private
investments. This calls for a drastic
reduction in non-plan expenditure.
Downsizing of staff is already underway and this is a positive
step. However, while downsizing all
those offices which are not engaged in “productive work” should be identified
and such offices should either be closed down or the strength of personnel in
these offices should be brought down to the minimum. In fact, the government should encourage only
“productive employment”.
12. Economic Reforms will Eliminate Corruption
With
government controls existing in almost every area of economic activity,
corruption cannot be got rid of, without privatization and globalization. As economic reforms progress further, the
government’s role will come down in many areas. This will go a long way in
eliminating corruption and freeing people from harassment, which may exist at
various levels. Hence, reforms need to
be given greater push.
13. Good Governance
The business of the government should not be
to do business but to do the business of governing business. The only business
of government should be “good governance”. Good governance can be easily
ensured, if government concentrates only in a few areas and employ people of
proven integrity with high efficiency in those areas, to manage the affairs. Such areas can be education, health,
defence, police, social security etc.
14.
Telecommunications
The reforms carried out in the
telecom sector so far, has enabled the
country to achieve runaway success in this sector. However,lot needs to be done to catch up with
the rest of the world. More players should be allowed in this sector
to increase competition and bring down prices further. The broadband connectivity has to be expanded
to cover the whole country and the price of broadband connectivity should be
brought down. This will go a long way in spreading e-governance everywhere and
providing many of the services to the consumers at their doorsteps.
15. Labour Reforms
In the present era of globalization,
India cannot compete in the World market, if reforms are not carried out in the
labour market. For example, in the textile sector, exporters are often forced
to reject large-quantity supply orders because they are in no position to raise
the strength of their work force. These
much-million-dollar orders then find their way to other competing countries,
besides raising questions over India’s reliability as a source in the global
supply chain.
Labour laws have to be rationalized
to increase labour mobility and establish a relation between productivity and
remuneration. A large number of labour in informal sector is paid below the
minimum wage provided in the Minimum Wages Act.
The Act is rarely implemented in most cases, whereas in the organized
sector, through collective bargaining, the majority of the labour force gets
remuneration above their productivity as there is no systematic mechanism to
relate productivity to remuneration. The
labour laws need to be amended to take care of this. However, this may lead to large retrenchment
of labour force. In order to ensure that retrenched labour is not put into
hardship, retrenchment schemes should have proper “safety net”. Government should develop training programme
and facilities for self-employment.
Sometimes,
changes in the labour laws arise out of demands being made by labour. For
example, in Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu), women workers are demanding a minimum
12–hour work-a –day to raise their earnings.
Changes in labour laws are necessary to enable industries to
“modernize”. Reforms in the labour market need to be done at the earliest to
eliminate cumbersome entry-exit barriers and create a favourable environment
for higher investment in the industrial sectors.
16. Removing Regional Imbalances
There
is no doubt that at the national level, both urban and rural areas have been
greatly benefited due to reforms. Almost all the states have also gained.
However, there are wide inter-state and inter-city variations. The reasons are
imminent. A large chunk of foreign and domestic investments have gone into
those areas which have big markets, qualified and skilled manpower, better
infrastructure facilities, better law and order situation etc. The backward
areas have been bypassed. U.P and Bihar have not been able to attract
much foreign investment because of poor state of physical infrastructure in
these states.
The states, which have poor
infrastructure facilities, have to give top priority to improve the situation,
if they want to attract foreign and domestic investments. Further, such states
have to evolve incentive schemes to attract investment. Last, but not the
least, law and order should also be given due attention, as only such states
which are free from law and order problems and can maintain public order, will
be found as a favourite destination for investors. There are some states where
the law and order situation is far from satisfactory and if these states
continue to be so, they will lose out in the race in attracting investment and
will lag far behind in development. These states should wake up before it is
too late.
17. Stricter Laws for Checking Evasion of Tax
In a country with a population of more than
one billion, only a few thousands are showing their income as Rs.10 lakhs and
above. This is totally unrealistic, more
so where there is an open, blatant and vulgar display of luxury. For the assessment year 1999-2000, the total
number of people (individual status) filing income tax returns was only 1.42
crore ( Source : Central Statistical Organisation : “Statistical Abstract,
India, 2003”), which works to only about 1.4% of country’s population of 102.86
crore as per the 2001 Census. The total tax payable by these individual
assessees was only Rs.10376.73 crore. Tax exemptions are misused by
unscrupulous elements. Some of the
private hospitals and nursing homes, which earn crores of rupees, misuse the
exemptions provided for research.
Similarly, many charitable trusts, which are exempt from income tax,
misuse the provision to their advantage.
Filing of income tax returns should be made mandatory even for such
institutions, which enjoy income tax exemptions. Punishment for tax evasion has
to be made more stringent. Raids by income tax department should be made
periodic to unearth black money and detect tax evaders.
18. Reduction in Stamp Duty
In
order to encourage housing activity as well as to make transfer of properties
without undervaluing them, it would be desirable to keep the Stamp Duty as low
as possible. It is desirable to keep the maximum rate of Stamp Duty at 5%. Lower rate of Stamp Duty would help to
eliminate transfer of properties on ‘Power of Attorney’, which is widely
prevalent in Delhi.
19. Reduction in Income Tax Rates
Tax rates, both direct and indirect, should be such
that citizens willingly and gladly come forward to pay taxes without any
resentment. This can be easily achieved if tax rates are kept at low levels so
that citizens will not consider’ taxes’ as a burden, but as an instrument of
government to raise revenues to provide better service to its citizens.
Though Income Tax rates have been brought down over
the past few years, yet it has not given the required relief to the common man.
The maximum rate of Income Tax should not be more than 20% and the following
income slabs can be followed. There should be no exemption of any kind, as such
exemptions only complicate matter.
Upto
Rs. 2 lakhs Nil
Rs.
2 – 5 lakhs 5%
Rs.
5 – 10 lakhs 10%
Rs.
10 lakhs & above 20%
The
Income Tax rates can be fixed as shown above, but the “Income Slabs’ should be
revised every year depending upon the inflation rate.
20.
Expenditure Tax in lieu of Income Tax
The possibility of introducing
Expenditure Tax in lieu of Income Tax needs to be explored. This tax can be in the form of tax on
withdrawals/ payments made through cheques / withdrawal forms / mail transfers
etc.. It seems the government can earn
much more revenue than what it is earning through direct taxes (Corporate
Income Tax + Personal Income Tax) at present. Further, since the tax will be on
withdrawals/payments made through cheques/withdrawal forms etc., the tax cannot
be evaded. In addition, the tax gets
collected instantly. Fourthly, the cost
that is incurred for collecting direct taxes can be drastically brought down.
As per the “Statistical Abstract-India-2003”
published by the Central Statistical Organisation, the total amount of cheques
cleared by the clearinghouses throughout India was about Rs.135 lakh crores
during 2002-03(provisional). This amount excludes the cheques cleared by banks
themselves and payments made through mail-transfers. Even if just 5% (as against a minimum of 10%
Income Tax prevailing at present) is levied on the amount mentioned above, the
government can earn about Rs.6.75 lakh crores, which is more than eight times
the revenue of 0.83 lakh crores earned during 2002-03(actuals) on account of
direct taxes (Source: “Economic Survey-2004-05”, Ministry of Finance,
Government of India). Of course, the amount of cheques cleared by clearing
houses includes government cheques also and hence the expected revenue from
Expenditure Tax may be working out very high.
However, the possibility of introducing Expenditure Tax in place of
Income Tax needs to be examined.
The household statistics released
by the Census of India 2001 indicate that about 7 crore households avail
banking services in India. However, with the spread of banking facilities and
ATM centers, it should not be difficult to increase this figure to at least 10
crore households. If the average
withdrawal of a household in a year is taken as Rs. 1 lakh and if 5 % tax is
levied on this withdrawal, the government can easily earn a revenue of Rs.
50000 crore annually on account of Expenditure Tax, which is almost equivalent
to the estimated revenue of Rs. 50929 crore for 2004-05 on account of personal
income tax (Source: “Economic Survey-2004-05”, Ministry of Finance). It has to be noted here that no big
administrative machinery is required to collect Expenditure Tax, as it gets
automatically collected, and hence the expenditure on collecting the tax will
be negligible.
21. Property Tax
The basis of assessment of property tax should be
such that it is easy to calculate and does not give any scope for the tax
inspector to harass the property owners. All the states and union territories
should emulate the model of Delhi to free the property owners from the clutches
of property tax inspectors. In Delhi, the property tax is now assessed on the
basis of the ‘plinth area’ following the unit area approach, and not on the
rental / ratable value of the property. This has helped in eliminating
corruption while assessing property tax. Now, the property owners themselves
calculate the tax payable, as the method is very simple now. The era of
harassment of property owners by tax inspectors is over in Delhi.
22. Levying New Taxes / Fees
There is a need to identify new taxes/ fees/ charges
that will not cause any resentment among the people. In this connection, the
following suggestions are made.
a. A minimum of Rs.5 can be charged for each Railway Reservation Form. This
will not only bring additional revenue for the Railways, but also check wastage
of forms.
b. A small fee can be levied annually on each of the vehicles in urban areas
as “ Urban Space Occupation Fee’, as vehicles occupy a large space in urban
areas. Land is very “costly’ in urban areas, especially in metropolitan cities.
23. Identifying New Revenue Earning Areas
At
present, there are thousands of Cable Operators who are providing “Cable T.V.”
service, but not much revenue is accruing to the government from this sector.
The Central Government can completely take over “ Cable T.V.” and beam all
channels through its own “DTH” system and recover charges from the consumers by
levying an appropriate monthly fee.
24. Converting
India into a Common Market - Goods & Services Tax
Anyone who sells a product across
Indian lives through the nightmare of state sales tax,
central sales tax, entry tax, turnover tax, service tax, Octroi - all cascading
to make India perhaps the highest indirect taxed nation in the world. Octroi is the worst. Today, a truck takes 40 hours to deliver
goods from Delhi to Bombay. Of this,
only 24 hours are spent driving, the remaining 16 hours are spent at Octroi
posts. The answer is to replace this nightmare of taxes by a single flat Goods
and Services Tax that is IT intensive, offers transparent, frictionless
interface between taxpayer and collector, and integrates the whole country into
one market. As a virtual national VAT,
it would tax only the added value at each state and thus lower tax burden. It would discourage cash transactions because
no one in the value chain wants to lose credit for taxes already paid. Thus, compliance would rise, taxpayers would
swell, and government revenues would multiply.
By eliminating the entire plethora of indirect taxes, transaction costs
and thereby reducing the scope for corruption, the nation’s competitiveness
would climb.
25. Level Playing Field
Private
sector has already entered many areas in a big way. In order to ensure that it
continues to enter more and more areas and also in a large scale , there should
not be discrimination against it and the rules of operations in a given
area should be the same for public and
private sectors where both of them are allowed to operate. This is also
necessary to ensure that the public sector also operates at its peak
efficiency.
26. Lending Rates in Banks
A low rate of interest is
indispensable to push up investment. Though rates of interest on loans have
been falling over the past few years, there is scope for bringing them down
further. Banks expenditure on establishment should be brought down drastically
to reduce lending rates. During the last
five years deposit rates have fallen from 12% to 5%, but housing rates have
fallen from about 15% to only 11% - except in case of home loans, which is
around 8%.
27. Making E-Governance Obligatory in Public
Government Departments
In
the present high tech electronic world, it is shocking that e-governance is yet
to take off in many of the state governments. With regard to local bodies, the
scenario is very dismal. E-governance should be made obligatory in all
government offices not only to provide quick and qualitative service to the
citizens but also to reduce ‘’unproductive employment” in government offices.
E-governance will also go a long way in eliminating corruption and bringing
transparency in all areas. Saving in man-hours, lesser traffic on roads, lesser
pollution, lesser accidents, saving in terms of money for the public,
elimination of over-crowding and long queues in public dealing offices, saving
in fuel, neat and clean offices due to less paper work, less dependence on
postal services, instant communication between the service providers and seekers,
instant service are some of the other advantages of E-governance.
28. Awareness to Latest Technolgy
All government departments should be aware of the latest technology that is being adopted at the global level regarding the functions allotted to them and apply the same in India, if it can provide better service to the people at a lesser cost. Sometimes, latest technology may even help the departments to lesser their burden and enable the people to get the service themselves without depending on the government agency. A classic example in this regard is a household appliance/ machine that can convert air into water. This machine is already being marketed in Chennai and Delhi. The government needs to interact with the manufacturers of this machine to reduce its cost so that it becomes affordable to one and all. In a country, where there is acute shortage of potable drinking water, the machine should be considered as a boon. If the machine becomes affordable to each and everyone, then there may not be a need for big water supply schemes.
Conclusion
The indispensability of speeding up the process of economic reforms does
not mean that the government should not have any role to play in the economic
system. Economic reforms do not mean diminishing the role of state but only
redefining it – expanding it in some areas and reducing in some areas. In fact,
the government should play a greater role by acting as watch dog, regulator and
facilitator. If government involves itself in a lesser way in economic sectors,
it will have more funds to play an active role in social sectors like
education, health and social security.
In fact, in health and education sectors, the government has to play a
dominant role as service provider, as these services will become inaccessible
to poor, if these sectors are left to be managed by private sector alone. Whatever may be the areas or sectors, an
“optimal mix“ of public sector and private sector is required so that goods
& services can become accessible to one and all. Poverty cannot be
eliminated without economic reforms. We
need dynamic markets, social investment
and good governance to end poverty.
Economic reforms would fail to meet the aspirations of people if
government fails to invest in education, health and safety nets.
No comments:
Post a Comment