Section Quality management system
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
No.
|
Criteria
|
Scores
|
Notes
|
||||
Good
|
Satisfactory
|
Unsatisfactory
|
|
||||
1
|
Existence of certified Quality Management
System (availability of current fundamental documents and compliance with
them) / Existence of plan for establishing Quality Management System and
preparation for its certification (in case of having no QMS certificate)
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
Monitoring of customer claims, development and
implementation of corrective actions
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
Internal audit of QMS, assessment of efficiency
of activities implemented in accordance with results of the audit.
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
Organisation of receiving inspection: the
receiving inspection is organised in accordance with requirements of
documented procedure
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
Equipment of control points (posts): existence of and compliance with operating
instructions; visualisation of defects; availability and keeping of
regulatory documents
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
Availability of certified technological
laboratories or agreements with third party specialised institutions
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
7
|
Monitoring of quality of manufactured products,
spoilage analysis and systematic solution of problems in case any differences
are detected
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
|
|
8
|
Visualisation of information on stands about
quality of manufactured products. Personnel awareness.
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
9
|
Availability of feedback in respect of customer
claims, development of corrective
actions according to results of the claims
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
10
|
Systematic informing of consumer about any
changes in manufacturing process, used raw inputs and materials, and places
of manufacture of products
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
11
|
Working with suppliers in respect of
quality: system of assessment, holding
audits, development of suppliers
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
12
|
Personnel: skills, work load, number of shifts,
availability of interchange matrix and schedules for job training.
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
13
|
Level of apprehension by personnel
participating in the audit of the questions being asked (level of skills).
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
Results
of the assessments
|
Maximum
possible score
|
45
|
|
||||
Scores
received according to results of the assessment
|
|
|
|||||
NFCL thankful to beloved SIRS-Shri K.S RAJU, Shri US JHA Chairman, Shri RAHUL RAJU–MD , SHRI RM DESHPANDE, Shri R.RAGHAVAN, Shri GVS ANAND, SHRI VIJAY KUMAR (Site Incharge), Shri G.B.Rao Shri PVSN Raju, Dr. V. Sunny John, Shri KS Gunasekhar , Shri IVSN Raju.Shri MSRKS Prasad, Shri D.Mohanty , Shri Uma Maheswar Rao, Shri T. Govind Babu, Shri. LVV RAO, Shri. DV Reddy, Promotion- EHSQ-Industry by Dr. A.N. GIRI- SPECIAL THANKS TO BELOVED DYNAMIC MD-SHRI RAHUL RAJU SIR-25.3 LAKHS EHSQ Viewed.
Saturday 11 April 2015
Quality management system- scores
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment