Thursday 13 September 2012

Global Effects of Ozone Depletion



Global Effects of Ozone Depletion
Background Information
The information given here is purposely vague, there is just enough to get you oriented to the topic.
Approximately 25 kilometres above the Earth's surface, there lies a thick blanket of ozone (O3), the ozone shield, which protects life on our planet. This layer absorbs most of the Sun's damaging ultraviolet (UV) rays. UV can cause serious damage to living tissue and affects the health of organisms in a wide variety of ways.
The thickness of the ozone layer varies naturally. Stratospheric pressures and winds tend to move the ozone towards the poles; therefore, the layer may be 50% thicker at the mid to high latitudes. As well, due to the lack of light at the northern polar region in winter (opposite in the southern hemisphere), the thickness of the ozone layer is at its greatest by February.
In the late 1960s, it was suspected that emissions from aircrafts may have been contributing to the depletion in the ozone layer. Scientists, in the early 1970s, believed that it was, in fact, active chlorine atoms that were destroying the ozone. After the discovery of the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica in 1985 and more evidence surfacing regarding the effects of synthetic compounds, a concerted effort was put forth on a global scale to tackle the issue of ozone depletion.
Emissions of industrial halocarbons account for most of the ozone depletion in the stratosphere. Some of these compounds have been around since the 1930s and are still widely used in diverse applications. As an example, one single Styrofoam cup has one billion (109) ozone-destroying molecules trapped within its airspaces, meaning that it has the potential of destroying one hundred thousand billion (1014) ozone molecules. To compound the problem, these stable, ozone-depleting chemicals can survive in the atmosphere from ten to hundreds of years.
The ozone shield has thinned dramatically in the northern polar region as well. Many scientists believe that an Arctic hole in the ozone will soon be a reality. Ozone losses are not confined to the polar regions either. The 1980s saw triple the losses in ozone, as compared to the 1970s, across temperate and tropical zones of the world.
Suggested Websites to Visit
Guiding Questions
This research topic should be presented as a formal paper. Give as full an account of the environmental issue as you can. Be sure to also include detailed answers to each of the following guiding questions within your paper. Include maps, tables, charts and diagrams as required. Remember to cite all sources used throughout your work.
1.     Is there a difference between ground-level ozone and stratospheric ozone?
2.     What are the specific names of the ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in question, and what are they used for throughout the world?
3.     How exactly do ODSs destroy stratospheric ozone?
4.     What ecological concepts must we know to understand the problem?
5.     What abiotic and biotic factors are involved in this issue?
6.     Are there natural occurrences in the ecosystem that also contribute to ozone depletion?
7.     What is the scientific evidence that this is indeed an environmental problem needing to be addressed?
8.     What exactly is UV radiation? Are there differences in type of UV radiation? Do they have different effects?
9.     How is the natural world (not including humans) affected by ozone depletion and increased UV radiation, plants, animals and various ecosystems?
10.   Why is it that the Antarctic region is much more adversely affected by ozone depletion than other areas?
11.   How has the Antarctic ozone hole changed since 1985?
12.   Are other areas at risk of ozone depletion as well?
13.   How are humans affected by ozone depletion and increased UV radiation, directly and indirectly?
14.   How is ozone depletion linked to the global climate?
15.   Who are the main culprits responsible for this environmental issue?
16.   Who does this issue affect?
17.   What are the social/cultural effects of this problem?
18.   Who is involved in coming up with solutions to the problem?
19.   What can an individual do to help counteract the problem of ozone depletion?
20.   What is being done to address the problem on national and international levels (scientific problem-solving and legislation, e.g. Montreal Protocol, US Clean Air Act)?
21.   Which of the available strategies do ecologists consider to be most effective for controlling ozone depletion?
22.   What does the future hold for the success and/or failure of these solutions?

No comments:

Post a Comment