5.4 Management Planning
Setting a direction
by scott dawson
WHAT'S THE POINT?
To some, the point of ISO 9001 registration
is a certificate. While important to convince customers that certain
procedures are in place, a certificate can be a very expensive piece of
paper if that is the only benefit realized by the organization. To
others, the point of IS0 9001 is measured performance improvement for
the organization, and the certificate is merely a confirmation of an
effective quality management system (QMS). This results-focused view of
ISO 9001 is confirmed by the growing number of companies pursuing
"compliance through self-certification" instead of a formal
registrar-certification of their QMS.
The framers of new standard also saw performance improvement as the
central point of the standard. The expanded top management
responsibilities make clear who must lead the charge toward measurable
results.
Top management shall ensure that quality objectives … are established … within the organization. (ref. 5.4.1)
The quality system must be planned and implemented by top management:
in order to meet … the quality objectives. (ref. 5.4.2)
"The point of IS0 9001 is measured performance improvement for the organization."
So, as top management sits down to discuss quality objectives, they must
define quality for their organization and its customers. Surely the
quality of products and services should be included. Certainly measures
of customer satisfaction would be on the list of key objectives. But
what about other drivers of a quality organization such as:
|
|
BREAKING DOWN THE STANDARD
The section entitled "Planning" (5.4) starts with a mandate for senior management:
Top management shall ensure that quality objectives, including those
needed to meet requirements for product [see 7.1 a)], are established at
relevant functions and levels within the organization. (ref. 5.4.1)
The primary responsibility for the establishment of quality objectives
cannot be delegated, though involving the rest of the organization can
help ensure the objectives are realistic with a high degree of buy-in.
Top management must determine performance targets for the organization
as a whole, and then break them down into smaller sub-objectives that
can be assigned to divisions, departments, teams or individuals, as
appropriate.
As is stated, the objectives must include required product quality goals as specified in section 7.1, Planning of Product Realization:
In planning product realization, the organization shall determine the following, as appropriate:
a) quality objectives and requirements for the product (ref. 7.1)
The additional objectives set are left to the judgment of management
based on the organization's size, market, product mix, complexity, etc.
It is typical that the organization limit the number of objectives to
those most vital to the organization's success.
DEFINING MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES
The objectives must also be measured:
The quality objectives shall be measurable and consistent with the quality policy. (ref. 5.4.1)
This would eliminate "motherhood-and-apple-pie" statements that are mere
slogans espousing a general desire for quality. By stating that
objectives must be "measurable", an objective set of data gathered,
reported and analyzed should be able to clearly indicate whether or not
specific objectives have been reached.
In establishing measurable objectives, many companies define the following for each:
Objective – Statement of the performance area to be achieved.
Measurement – Data to be collected to monitor actual performance.
Baseline – Historical level of performance; establishes the starting point.
Target – Specific performance goal for the objective.
Target Date – Date by which the target is to be achieved.
Owner – Person/group responsible to gather, report and analyze the measurement data.
Reporting Frequency – Schedule for reporting, analyzing and responding to the measurement data.
Review Frequency – Schedule for reviewing the objective and corresponding target for possible modification to ensure ongoing relevancy for the organization.
While this format is not specified by the ISO 9001 requirements, an organization might want to consider including many of these elements in their quality objectives planning.
It is also required that all quality objectives are "consistent with the quality policy" (see 5.3). That means there must be logical relationship between the performance targets of the organization and top management's statement of intention that it intends to achieve quality as a result of the company's operation (In addition to setting quality objectives, management is responsible for planning the overall QMS.
Top management shall ensure that
a) the planning of the quality management system is carried out in order
to meet the requirements given in 4.1, as well as the quality
objectives, and
b) the integrity of the quality management system is maintained when changes to the quality management system are planned and implemented. (ref. 5.4.2)
b) the integrity of the quality management system is maintained when changes to the quality management system are planned and implemented. (ref. 5.4.2)
First, the QMS must be planned (and implemented) to be sure the
requirements listed in the "General Requirements" for the QMS (ref. 4.1)
are met. These requirements are summarized below:
- The QMS must be established and continually improved.
- QMS processes must be identified (including processes outsourced by the company) and their sequence and interactions determined.
- Criteria and methods of control must be established to be sure the QMS processes are effective (NOTE: The company's quality objectives can meet this requirement).
- Needed resources and information must be available to operate and monitor the QMS processes.
- QMS processes must be monitored, measured and analyzed.
- Actions must be taken to meet planned results (quality objectives) and continually improve QMS processes.
- The QMS processes must meet the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard.
Second, the QMS must deliver results. It is expected that top management monitor the company's performance against its stated quality objectives and take necessary actions to be sure these objectives are met. Third-party auditors will certainly be looking to see a strong pattern of meeting stated objectives.
Third, the QMS planning process must respond to significant organizational changes by making necessary adjustments to policies, procedures, quality objectives, etc. Changes that could require QMS modifications might include new product lines, customers with new requirements, marked organizational growth or downsizing, acquisition or divestiture of company facilities, management reorganizations, etc.
THE POINT OF IT ALL
This brief set of management "planning" requirements has huge
implications for any organization seeking ISO 9001 compliance or
registration. Senior management must "direct the ship" by steering the
organization toward clearly stated, consistently measured and carefully
analyzed quality objectives. It is through the use of quality
objectives that top management can keep the organization focused on what
is most important to the company and its customers, ensuring improving
results that deliver real, demonstrable quality throughout the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment