Thursday, 6 December 2012

Tie Promotions to Performance



Tie Promotions to Performance
What Kochanski has found is that promotions are poorly managed. Budgeting for the cost seems to help. Promotions should be related to growth and turnover. If you’re promoting faster than that combination, you’re adding cost and making the organization top heavy.
You need to track and report across units, with calibration. Certainly require several levels of approval, Kochanski says
Entitlement Promotions
Real pay for Performance
  • Time-based
  • No budget
  • Varies significantly period to period
  • No tracking or reporting
  • Few standards
  • Approval process unclear
  • Opportunity for favoritism
  • Performance -based
  • Cost is budgeted
  • Tracked and reported across units
  • Promotions calibrated
  • Requires multi-level approval
For example take a look at these criteria and how they may affect compensation.

Criterion

Assessment

Degree of increase in responsibilities
Moderate
More significant
Signifi-cant
Performance compared to expectation 
Effective 
Very effective
Exceptiona
Current salary relative to mid-point of new grade 
High
Same
Low
Current salary relative to others in similar jobs in new grade (with similar skills, knowledge, competencies, and experience)
High
Same
Low
Depth and breadth of skills and knowledge (assumes demonstration)
Moderate
Higher
High
Recommended increase
Modest Increase
3% –5%
Moderate Increase
5% –8%
Significant Increase
8% –10%








No comments:

Post a Comment