Reviewing Site Plans for Stormwater Management
Considering
Stormwater
Management
in Site Plan Review
. A major consideration of this
site plan review should be the proposed development’s impact on water
resources, particularly from polluted stormwater runoff, or “nonpoint source
pollution.”
Traditionally,
stormwater management has emphasized water quantity, with little concern for
water quality. To address both of these factors in a comprehensive manner, each
site plan should contain a stormwater management plan that details the impact
of proposed land use on water quantity and quality, both on-site and within the
watershed.
While the detailed engineering
is best left to trained professionals, land use commissioners can review plans
for compliance with general planning guidelines.
The Need for Stormwater
Management in a Watershed Framework
When
water falls to earth as rain or snow most of it seeps into the ground. However,
if the ground is saturated, frozen or covered with impervious surfaces, excess
precipitation flows over the land. Stormwater management is the process of
controlling and cleansing excess runoff so it does not harm natural resources
or human health.
A major focus of stormwater management should be prevention
of nonpoint source water pollution. ( It is more cost effective to prevent
flooding and water pollution than to correct problems after damage has
occurred.
Potential
Impact of Development on Water Resources. Development may
disturb land and create impervious surfaces such as roads, rooftops and
compacted soil that in turn drastically change natural drainage patterns.
During construction, existing grades and vegetation can be damaged, resulting
in soil erosion. Runoff from these areas can pollute streams. Development,
through increases in impervious surfaces and installation of storm sewers,
speeds movement of concentrated pollutants off-site and interferes with water
infiltration to the ground.
Traditional
Approaches To Stormwater Management. Most communities attempt to
manage stormwater by emphasizing water quantity rather than water quality. The
goal has been to drain water from developed sites as rapidly as possible
through the use of gutters, downspouts, pipes, curbs, catch basins and
culverts. Some communities require developers to install detention ponds to
temporarily store a portion of the excess runoff, then gradually release it after
the peak natural runoff has occurred. Many hydrologists are concerned that
mandating detention ponds on each site, while controlling runoff in the
immediate vicinity, may work to collectively increase peak flows in the
watershed, resulting in downstream flooding. Experts caution about reliance on
one management practice to solve all drainage issues.
The Importance of Watershed Management Plans. Stormwater
management begins with an under-standing that every piece of land is part of a
watershed. A watershed is defined as an area in which all drainage flows to a
common outlet. Comprehensive land use planning and sound site design are
necessary for effective stormwater management. Water resource experts strongly
recommend that towns develop watershed management plans, so that management
practices on individual sites can be coordinated as to location, size and
function. Comprehensive watershed management plans include data from field
inspections and inventories of existing drainage structures, mapping of
watercourses, analysis of runoff rates and allowable capacities, and
identification of existing and potential problem areas.
In addition to hydraulic and quantity impact analysis,
watershed management plans should also address water quality issues. Things to
be identified in the plan should include: priority water resources to be protected;
known sources of contamination and existing pollutant levels; particular
contaminants of concern; water quality goals; and overall watershed-level
protection
efforts to
minimize impervious surfaces with efforts to maximize infiltration of clean
runoff into the ground. Untreated stormwater should not be allowed to discharge
directly into surface or subsurface waters. Site-specific runoff control
measures should be based on their location within the watershed. Effective
stormwater management will maintain the natural patterns of runoff within the
watershed. For instance, clean runoff from the lower portions of the watershed
should be allowed to pass downstream without delay (as long as the downstream
floodway is capable of handling these flows), while runoff from the central and
upper sections of the watershed should be slowed or held back to prevent
increasing peak flow rates.
The Contents of a
StormwaterManagement Plan
Developers
are generally required to submit site plans to help local officials determine
whether proposed development complies with municipal land use regulations. Each
site plan should contain a stormwater management plan addressing the impact the
proposed land use will have on water quantity and quality.
Site-level
stormwater management plans are generally composed of maps and a narrative. The
maps and associated construction drawings show existing site features and
proposed alterations highlighting the location and type of proposed stormwater
management system. The narrative consists of a written statement explaining the
natural and proposed drainage system, a detailed description of projected
runoff quantity and quality and an explanation of why certain management
practices were chosen for pollution control. Highlighted should be a detailed
description of the relationship of the proposed development to drainage and
runoff within the entire watershed (with reference to a watershed management
plan should one exist). Provisions for site safety and maintenance of approved
management measures
should
also be included.
Principles to Strive for in
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management should include
measures to control and convey runoff flow, and to collect and cleanse runoff
on-site. These principles might be summarized as “The Four C’s” of stormwater
management: control, conveyance, collection and cleansing. Measures do
not fall neatly into an category in most cases; for instance, measures that
control swales, may convey and clean runoff as well. These four
principles, however, can provide a helpful framework for looking at stormwater
plans.
1.
Control.
Control measures can be broken down into two categories: source control
measures focus on pollution prevention. Their objective is to avoid or
limit the generation of pollutants. Typical source control measures
include lot sweeping, hazardous waste collection, and reduced usage of
fertilizers and pesticides. Runoff control measures focus on slowing down
runoff, in order to reduce the likelihood of erosion, downstream flooding, and
pollutant transport. These measures include limiting impervious surfaces,
directing flow over grass swales or other vegetated areas, storing runoff in
ponds, and installing infiltration systems.
Conveyance.
Conveyance systems are used to drain and direct the flow of runoff generated on
a site. This is done with the pipes feeding into catch basins and storm
sewers. More natural systems using vegetated depressions and swales,
which look and function like the natural drainage system, should be used
whenever possible. Existing systems can be adapted to reduce runoff; for
example, perforated pipes can be used to promote infiltration. Particular
attention should be given to system outlets, which commonly become restricted
or blocked if poorly designed.
The Storm Management System shall:
1. Consider the total environmental impact of the proposed system.
2. Consider water quality as well as water quantity.
3. Be consistent with the local Plan of Development, and any
existing watershed management plan.
4. Coordinate with erosion control measures and aquifer
protection.
5. Minimize disturbance of natural grades and vegetation, and
utilize existing topography for
natural drainage systems.
6. Preserve natural vegetated buffers along water resources and
wetlands.
7. Minimize impervious surfaces and maximize infiltration of
cleansed runoff to appropriate soils.
8. Direct runoff to minimize off-site volume.
9. Reduce peak flow to minimize the likelihood of soil erosion,
stream channel instability,
flooding and habitat destruction.
10.Use wetlands and water bodies to receive or treat runoff only
when it is assured that these
natural systems will not be overloaded or
degraded.
11. Provide a maintenance schedule for management practices,
including designation of
maintenance responsibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment