Going Beyond Lost time Injuries
“You
can’t manage what you can’t measure” – Drucker
"If
we are in the business of promoting OHS, why do we use failures as the measure
of our success?" - Rose
Today, many industries and indeed regulatory agencies still focus
completely on common safety performance measures such as lost time injury
frequency rate and number of lost days in an effort to measure safety
performance. Unfortunately, such indicators just measure failure to control and
give no indication of risk management effort, which may take time to come to
fruition. Such outcome measures, when used to judge safety performance, are
known as lagging indicators.
Use of Lagging Indicators - Lost time
injury frequency rate, severity rate, lost days etc.
|
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
|
Table 1:
Advantages & Disadvantages of Lagging Indicators
Significantly
however, what we are all seeking is continuous improvement towards an incident
free workplace, yet when measuring lagging indicators – we are only monitoring
our performance at the last stage (how many fatalities, injuries, illnesses and
what rate do we experience these in our operation?)
Rather, we need
to examine the processes that lead to these failures and monitor how effective
our control mechanisms are in preventing these negative outcomes. Consequently
getting a better picture of the proactive measures in place to reduce these
outcomes and risks, thus the use of leading or positive performance measures
(PPMs) has to be recommended.
A positive
performance measure (PPM) is a measure of a proactive leading activity necessary
to control loss and damage. It is an upstream process measure rather than a
downstream outcome measure. Examples of PPMs, which can be applied in the
workplace, are presented in Table 2 below:
Examples of the Application of Positive Performance Measures for Safety
|
||||
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Measure/monitor
|
Results
|
Improve
|
All activities to be
subject to hazard analysis and risk assessment
|
Risk Assessment
|
% Risk assessment
complete
% Control measures
implemented
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Written Work
Procedures in place for critical activities
|
Work procedures
|
% Written procedures
complete
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Provision of safe
place of work
|
Work place inspection
target for each frontline supervisor across whole site on a monthly basis
each with specific area
Workplace visibility
tour by middle and senior managers in their work area once per month
|
% Scheduled
inspections complete by name and work area/dept.
% Actions arising
complete by name and work area/dept
%
Visibility/Inspection Tours complete
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Employees working
safely
|
Behaviour based observations
|
% Employees working
safely
% PPE compliance
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Incident reporting and
implementation remedial measures
|
Timeliness of
reporting
Incident investigation
effectiveness Log of corrective actions
|
% Incidents reported
within 24 hours
% Near miss incidents
% Incident
investigation complete on time
% Corrective actions
implemented
All by area/dept.
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Safe and competent
employees
|
Performance assessment
including training needs identification Training records
|
% Performance
assessments complete
% Scheduled training
complete
All by area/dept.
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Improve safety
awareness
|
Toolbox talks on
targeted topics monthly by all Supervisors
|
% Tool Box Talks
complete by Dept.
% Employees attending
% Actions arising
complete
All by Area/Dept.
% Safety
Representatives Trained
|
Track reported % on a
monthly basis by area/department
|
Review progress at
monthly senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Improve safety culture
|
Annual climate survey
|
Overall findings based
on selected criteria
All by Area/Dept.
|
Track trends on annual
basis and by area/dept
|
Review progress at
annual senior management meetings, target areas for improvement
|
Table 2:
Examples of PPM’s for Safety
Essentially PPMs are tracking the drivers of
effective safety and risk management. Organisations need to recognize that there
is no single reliable measure of health & safety performance, what is required
is a ‘basket of measures or a ‘balanced scorecard’ providing information on a
range of health & safety activities. Measurement of PPM’s provides information
on how the system operates in practice, identifies area where remedial action is
required, provides a basis for continuous improvement and provides a mechanism
for feedback and consequential motivation.
Should you consider applying PPM’s for
safety in your workplace, it is vitally important that for any PPM chosen
everyone understands exactly what’s being
measured and what signifigance the use of the measurement will have on producing
the desired result in your organisation. It should also be administratively
practicable, quantifiable & reproducible, as
objective and error free as possible and readily
relate to aspect trying to control and/or goals set.
It is also
important to distinguish between two the types of process indicator: those,
which focus on the behaviour of employees and those, which measure management
activity. Examples of indicators of employee behaviour include; % of employees
wearing PPE (safety glasses, harness etc.), % hoses rolled-up, % pre-start
checks complete. One of the best features of such indicators is that merely
publicising the data within the workplace focuses attention on the problem and
is likely to lead to safety improvements without the need for more direct or
punitive management intervention usually within weeks not months, they are
positive and focus on how good rather than how poor safety performance is
involving all workers in improving safety, creating a safety culture and achieve
"ownership".
There is
however a significant drawback to such indicators. They are focused on and aimed
at changing the behavior of employees, not managers. Yet it is managers who are
ultimately responsible for health and safety and who are in the best position to
lead by example and take action where necessary. Hence the importance of
indicators, which measure the safety related activity of management. Examples
here include; % of workforce who has received specific safety training, %
managers participating in safety talks, % of safety audits, % risk assessments.
Such management indicators can usually be assigned once management has specified
its safety objectives and targets whereupon appropriate measures, which measure
actual performance, can be assigned.
When
considering PPMs for safety, define the key activities in your safety management
systems that need to be promoted, reinforced and visibly drive the culture.
Select the activity measures from these. For each of these PPMs you will
need to list the measure to be used, how it will be collected, calculated and
reported including the frequency of reporting. Some measures will need to be
collected daily, others weekly or monthly. Most will need to be reported monthly
or quarterly to be of value in monitoring performance (refer to examples in
Table 2 for a typical site). Those chosen will vary depending on the maturity of
the site and management style of the operation, significantly the measure need
to be owned by the site personnel.
Because PPMs
can be more focused on risk areas or specific targets/objectives they may not
need to continue as a constant or fixed PPM for years. If a particular area of
concern or issue is brought under control there may be other priority areas to
focus on and new PPMs can be adopted for these, so it is an ongoing improvement
process using a minimum number of PPMs relevant to an operation at the time. For
example, it is not of much value reporting 100% employees have received
inductions, month after month and in any case periodic audits will check systems
such as this remain effective in the long term.
No comments:
Post a Comment