A.1 HAZARD
IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & CONTROL WORKSHEET
Relevant Standards/ Codes,if any____________________________________________________________________________
Completed By: __________________________________________________________________________________ Date:_____
Reviewed By: __________________________________________________________________________________ Date:_____
Activity
|
Risk Identification
|
Residual Risk Assessment
|
Over
riding factor (LC/ DC/ Any other)
|
Risk control Action Required
|
||||||||||
Hazards
|
Condition
|
Adequacy
of Measure
|
Nature
of Risk Consequence
|
Severity
S
= LxC
|
Total
|
Risk
Classification
|
||||||||
Hazard Identified (Sudden release of energy or haz material)/
Source or situation having potential to cause injury, ill health
|
Who may get affected or exposed due to the hazard
|
|||||||||||||
D/I
|
R/NR
|
Existing
|
Gaps,
if any
|
How
Likely?
(L)
|
Possible
Level of Consequence
(C)
|
|||||||||
- Likelihood includes Probability of Hazardous Event Occurring / may occur.
- Risk Control Measures Examples: (Technology / Physical improvement / Management Programs /Operational control or procedure/ Training/ Supervision or monitoring / usage of PPE / Competence / Strengthening of Contract Documents / others including emergency preparedness).
.
A. 2 RISK ASSESSMENT CRITERIA/ CLASSIFICATION
Criteria Developed By:___________________________________________________________________________ Date______
Next Review By:_________________________________________________________________________________ Date:_____
Activity
|
Risk Identification
|
Residualsk Assessment
|
Over riding factor (LC/ DC/ Any other)
|
Risk control Action Required
|
Who
|
||||||||
Hazards
Identified
|
Condition
|
Adequacy
of Measure
|
Nature
of Risk Consequence
|
Severity
S
= LxC
|
Total
|
Risk
Classification
|
|||||||
D/I
|
R/NR
|
Existing
|
Gaps,
if any
|
How
Likely?
(L)
|
Possible Level of Consequence?
|
||||||||
HUL
(1)
|
Insignificant/
minor Inconvenience (1)
|
||||||||||||
UL
(2)
|
Slightly Harmful
(2)
|
||||||||||||
Likely
(3)
|
Harmful
(3)
|
||||||||||||
Very
Likely
(4)
|
Very
harmful (4)
|
||||||||||||
Certain
(5)
|
Extremely
Harmful or fatal
(5)
|
||||||||||||
Likelihood –
Possibility of occurrence of risks based on present gaps (technological /
operational / competence / measurement and monitoring);
Level of consequence – Refer Guidance criteria for this i.e. possible degree of
damage; LC – Legal Concern - if identified OHS hazards are risks is
governed by Indian OHS Legislation, DC – Domino Concern – Source or
Situation can Trigger of Chain of Accidents, Non-Tolerable OHS Risks Measures –
The Substantial and Intolerable risks shall be treated as
non-tolerable OHS risks,
requiring risk control measures (Management Programme / OCP / Both / Emergency
preparedness plan / obvious improvement / training OR competence development)
A.3 DETERMINING RISK LIKELIHOOD – GUIDANCE
CRITERIA
Likelihood
|
Criteria
|
Highly Unlikely (1)
|
If
almost no gap exists in control of the identified OHS hazard as
technology, operational control, competence, measurement monitoring in place
|
Unlikely (2)
|
If
there is any minor gap / weakness in control of the identified
OHS hazard
|
Likely (3)
|
There
are unreasonable gaps in control of the identified OHS hazard with
respect to adoption of technology, operational control, measurement
monitoring and competence
|
Very Likely (4)
|
There
are unreasonable major gaps in control of the identified OHS
hazard with respect to adoption of technology, operational control,
measurement monitoring and competence
|
Certain (5 )
|
There
are almost no controls in place in controlling the identified
OHS hazard and have occurred in the past but ignored.
|
4 DETERMINING RISK CONSEQUENCY LEVEL – GUIDANCE CRITERIA
Level of Harm
|
Human
|
Property
|
Exposure level
|
|
Insignificant (1)
|
Momentary Discomfort/ inconvenience
|
No action required
|
Below / equal to
prescribed TLV (8 hrs)
|
|
Slightly Harmful
(2)
|
Minor injuries (Non
reportable) requires first-aid
|
Minor damage
|
Above than prescribed
TLV (8 hrs);
However < 20%
|
|
Harmful
(3)
|
Injuries, absence from
the work less or equal to 48 hrs / temporary disability/ Medical Treatment
Cases
|
Moderate damage
|
Above than prescribed
TLV (8 hrs);
However within 20% - 40%
|
|
Very harmful (4)
|
Major injuries, absence
from the work more than 48 hrs / temporary disability/ Lost Time Injuries
|
Severe damages
|
Above than prescribed
TLV (8 hrs); however within
40-50%
|
|
Extremely Harmful
(5)
|
Fatal / Permanent
Disability. Major incidents involving large number of people
|
Annihilation (complete
destruction)
|
Above than prescribed
TLV (8 hrs);
AND > 50%, leading to
chronic notifiable disease
|
|
NOTE : TLV (8 hrs) As may be
prescribed in The Factory Act 1948 & Equivalent Standards
A.5 RISK
CLASSIFICATION INDICATOR
Consequence à
Likelihood ↓
|
INSIGNIFICANT (1)
|
SLIGHTLY HARMFUL (2)
|
HARMFUL (3)
|
VERY HARMFUL (4)
|
EXTREMELY HARMFUL (5)
|
HIGHLY UNLIKELY (1)
|
TRIVIAL (1)
|
TRIVIAL (2)
|
TOLERABLE (3)
|
TOLERABLE (4)
|
MODERATE (5)
|
UNLIKELY (2)
|
TRIVIAL(2)
|
TOLERABLE (4)
|
MODERATE (6)
|
MODERATE (8)
|
SUBSTANTIAL (10)
|
LIKELY (3)
|
TOLERABLE (3)
|
MODERATE (6)
|
MODERATE (9)
|
SUBSTANTIAL(12)
|
SUBSTANTIAL (15)
|
VERY LIKELY (4)
|
TOLERABLE (4)
|
MODERATE (8)
|
SUBSTANTIAL(12)
|
SUBSTANTIAL(16)
|
INTOLERABLE(20)
|
CERTAIN (5)
|
MODERATE (5)
|
SUBSTANTIAL(10)
|
SUBSTANTIAL(15)
|
INTOLERABLE(20)
|
INTOLERABLE(25)
|
A.6
DEFINITION OF LEVEL OF IMPACT / RISKS (REFERENCE IS 18001:2002)
Risk Level
|
Action and Time Scale
|
TRIVIAL
|
No action is required and
no documentary record needs to be kept.
|
TOLERABLE
|
No additional controls
are required. Consideration may be given to a more cost-effective solution or
improvement that imposes no additional cost burden. Monitoring is required to
ensure that the controls are maintained.
|
MODERATE
|
Efforts should be made to
reduce the risk, but the cost of prevention should be carefully measured and
limited. Risk reduction measures should be implemented.
|
SUBSTANTIAL
|
Work should not be
started until the risk has been reduced. Considerable resources may have to
be allocated to reduce the risk where the risk involves work in progress,
urgent action should be taken.
|
INTOLERABLE
|
Work should not be
started or continued until the risk has been reduced. If it is not possible
to reduce risk even with unlimited resources, work has to remain prohibited.
|
A.7 INPUTS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING THE
IDENTIFICATION OF OHS HAZARD AND RISK
Core team
along with departmental managers to consider following input information for
hazard identification / risk assessment purposes.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment